Abstract
Dual phase (DP) steels provide good strength and ductility properties. Nevertheless, their forming capability is limited due to the damage characteristics of their constituting microstructural phases and interfaces. In this work, a specific type of interface is analysed, i.e., prior austenite grain boundaries (PAGBs). In the literature, prior austenite grain boundary fracture has been reported as an important damage mechanism of DP-steels. The influence of the morphology of phase boundaries near the PAGB and the role of the martensite substructure in the vicinity of a PAGB on damage initiation is analysed. The experimentally observed preferred sites of crack nucleation along the PAGB are assessed and clarified. A finite strain rate dependent crystal plasticity model accounting for the anisotropic elasto-plasticity of martensite (and also ferrite) was applied to an idealized volume element approximating a typical small-scale PAGB microstructure. The boundary value problem is solved using a fast Fourier transform (FFT) based spectral solver. The role of crystallography and geometrical features within the volume element is studied using simulations. Results are discussed considering possibly dominant regimes of elasticity and plasticity.
Highlights
A combination of martensite and ferrite, in an optimal proportion, lends dual phase (DP) steel an adequate balance between high strength and ductility
Body centered cubic (BCC)/body centered tetragonal (BCT) martensite is formed as a transformation product from parent face centered cubic (FCC) austenite
Computational tools that can simulate the mechanics of complex DP-steel microstructures exist, see for example open source code DAMASK
Summary
A combination of martensite and ferrite, in an optimal proportion, lends dual phase (DP) steel an adequate balance between high strength and ductility. Recent experimental work [10] has identified the prior austenite grain boundaries (PAGBs) within the martensite islands as preferable sites for damage nucleation. In the second part of the present work, we make use of the knowledge of the eigen strains associated with the transformation process This allows to explore the role of coherency of transformation strains, to gain further insight into the crystallography that makes prior austenite grain boundaries more (or less) damage resistant. To this effect, an idealization of a small region containing a PAGB intersecting a martensite–ferrite phase boundary is considered.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
