Abstract

To compare the therapeutic effect of arterial and lymphatic sparing microscopic retroperitoneal varicocelectomy (MRV) with that of microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV) for treatment of varicocele in infertile men. We conducted a prospective and controlled study to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of MRV and MSV for treatment of varicocele in infertile men. A total of 80 patients were randomly chosen to undergo MRV (n = 40) or MSV (n = 40) treatment. All patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Semen parameters, pregnancy, recurrence, and complications were examined. Mean operation time in the MRV group was significantly shorter than that in MSV group (38.92 ± 5.67 min vs 91.35 ± 15.08 min), and the number of observed spermatic veins in MRV group was significantly less than that in MSV group (3.59 ± 0.76 vs 18.22 ± 2.83). Sperm count and motility were significantly improved at 12 months follow-up in both groups compared with preoperative values, and the sperm count in the MRV group at 3 months was significantly higher than that in MSV group. Moreover, the incidence of scrotal edema was higher in the MSV group, although natural pregnancy rate was not significantly different between 2 groups at 1-year follow-up (42.1% vs 44.7%). MRV with artery and lymphatic sparing is a simple and effective technique for treatment of varicocele in infertile men.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.