Microsatellite versus AFLP analyses of pre-management introgression levels in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.)

Abstract

Loblolly pine and shortleaf pine are known to naturally hybridize. In this study, we used 42 microsatellite markers and isocitrate dehydrogenase isozyme to create genetic profiles of 202 loblolly and shortleaf pine trees grown from seed collected in the 1950s for the Southwide Southern Pine Seed Source Study. Estimated ΦPT was low in both loblolly (0.061) and shortleaf (0.080) pines, indicating that most of the diversity is accounted for within seed sources. However, both loblolly and shortleaf pines showed significant correlations between seed sources’ genetic and geographic distances, with R2 of 0.43 and 0.17, respectively. The hybridization rate was 4.0%, with more hybrids west of the Mississippi River (8.1%) than east of the river (2.1%). Additionally, about the same proportion of both species (4.5% of loblolly and 3.3% of shortleaf pine) were identified as hybrids. These results are consistent with prior studies on these two species but do contrast with the results from an amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis of the same samples. For example, the AFLP study concluded that 6.3% of the trees were hybrids, or 1.4 times higher than determined by this study. Of the 12 hybrids identified in the AFLP study, six were not identified as hybrids here, and of the eight hybrids identified here, only four were identified in the AFLP study. Although similar in overall results, we suggest that the microsatellite analysis is more convincing than the AFLP analysis because microsatellites provide more information per genetic locus than do AFLPs.