Abstract

In the past, the genetics of common carp populations has mainly been studied on regional levels using traditional protein markers. We analysed four microsatellite loci of 577 individuals from 22 domesticated, wild and feral populations spanning a geographical area as wide as from Europe through Central Asia to East and South-East Asia. The variability of these loci was much higher than that of the allozyme loci examined in our previous studies. A total number of 143 alleles were recorded across loci ranging from 27 at MFW28 to 47 at MFW7. However, the mean number of alleles per locus was remarkably lower: from 2.50 in a captive stock of River Amur wild carp to 14.25 in a wild population from Lake Arnasaiskie, Uzbekistan, and domesticated Chinese carp from Wuhan. The variability of populations did not show a clear geographical pattern but a highly significant difference was found in allelic richness between the 13 domesticated/captive stocks (average A r = 4.436) and the nine wild−caught populations (average A r = 8.221). The prevalence of different alleles in different populations resulted in a high degree of population differentiation: the F ST values for all but four pairwise comparisons of Central Asian wild populations were significant. Within geographical regions the D A distances between populations were smallest in Central Asia (average D A = 0.139), intermediate in Europe (average D A = 0.434) and largest in East/South-East Asia (average D A = 0.833). Between geographical regions the European and Central Asian populations showed the smallest distances (average D A = 0.484) whereas the distances of these two regions and East/South-East Asia were almost identical but substantially larger (Europe vs. East/South-East Asia: average D A = 0.801, and Central Asia vs. East/South-East Asia: average D A = 0.806). All populations clustered into only two highly divergent major groups with 91% bootstrap support: Europe/Central Asia and East/South-East Asia. Thus, the microsatellite data also suggest an ancient separation of European/Central Asian from East/South-East Asian carp and a single origin of European carp in Central Asia as already inferred from our previous allozyme and mtDNA RFLP studies. The taxonomic status of subspecies assigned to European ( C. c. carpio) and East Asian carp ( C. c. haematopterus) is supported. However, because of their close relationship to European carp the Central Asian carp do not deserve a separate subspecies status ( C. c. aralensis).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.