Abstract

Microplastic particles in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems are currently discussed as an emerging persistent organic pollutant and as acting as a vector for hydrophobic chemicals. Microplastic particles may ultimately deposit and accumulate in soil as well as marine and freshwater sediments where they can be harmful to organisms. In this study, we tested the sensitivity of natural freshwater sediment bacterial communities (by genetic fingerprint) to exposure to microplastics (polyethylene, 2 and 20 mg/g sediment) and microplastics loaded with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs, phenanthrene and anthracene), using a laboratory-based approach. After two weeks of incubation, the bacterial community composition from an unpolluted river section was altered by high concentrations of microplastics, whereas the community downstream of a wastewater treatment plant remained unchanged. Low microplastic concentrations loaded with phenanthrene or anthracene induced a less pronounced response in the sediment communities compared to the same total amount of phenanthrene or anthracene alone. In addition, biodegradation of the PAHs was reduced. This study shows, that microplastic can affect bacterial community composition in unpolluted freshwater sediments. Moreover, the results indicate that microplastics can serve as a vehicle for hydrophobic pollutants but bioavailability of the latter is reduced by the sorption to microplastics.

Highlights

  • In recent decades the widespread distribution of microplastics (MPs) in global ecosystems has been reported for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments [1,2,3,4,5]

  • Low and high doses of PE particles induced a significant reduction in the number of ARISA fragment lengths (AFLs) and the number of bacterial species, when compared to the natural sediment from the spring site

  • In contrast to the unpolluted site, the number of AFLs in sediment collected downstream of the wastewater treatment plant was not affected by the PE particles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In recent decades the widespread distribution of microplastics (MPs) in global ecosystems has been reported for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments [1,2,3,4,5]. A few studies have quantified MP loads in freshwater sediments [9,10,11] so far but modelling studies indicate that large amounts of MPs might be at least temporarily stored in river sediments [4,12]. The concentration of these MPs in sediments are usually higher than those in the water column [5]. Microplastics have been shown to have various direct physical effects on different organismal groups in marine and freshwater environments.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call