Microplanning verification and 2017/2018 measles vaccination campaign in Nigeria: Lessons learnt

Abstract

IntroductionThe measles supplemental immunisation activity is an effective strategy that improves vaccination coverage and reduces measles-related morbidity and mortality. However, the lack of compliance with microplanning processes, contributes to improper estimation of resources needed for a good SIA in Nigeria. We described the microplanning verification process for 2017/2018 measles vaccination campaign and highlighted the contribution of selected variables to the output of the microplan. MethodsWe conducted microplanning verification in 2 phases. In Phase 1, we verified at least 30% of randomly selected microplans to assess compliance with the steps and processes of developing good microplans. In Phase 2 we conducted desk review of the entire states micoplans and verified some selected variables at the ward level to corroborate the findings of the microplans. We collected data using open data kit and verification checklist. We conducted data analysis using SPSS and Microsoft Excel version 2016. ResultsAll states in Nigeria verified their wards’ microplans, 21 states (57%) verified more than 30% ,16 states (43%) verified less than 30%, Kebbi State verified the lowest (5.3%). Over 90% of microplans verified complied with the microplanning processes. We observed that overall, there was no significant difference in the number of target population, vaccination teams and qualified vaccinators after the verification process. ConclusionThe microplans for 2017/2018 measles vaccination campaign were developed according to the required procesesses, the target population, vaccination teams and qualified vaccinators were physically and realistically estimated. Adherence to microplanning processes is critical to the success of immunization programs.