Abstract

AbstractThe mechanical behavior of porous sandstones is generally modeled using concepts from granular mechanics, often overlooking the effect of cementation. To probe the key differences between sand and sandstone mechanics, we performed triaxial deformation experiments on Ottawa quartz sand at 5‐ to 40 MPa effective confining pressure. At 5 MPa, the samples are able to dilate. At higher confinement, the aggregates show continuous compaction, displaying strain hardening. The stress‐strain behavior is nonlinear, and the exact onset of inelastic compaction could not be determined accurately. Measured P‐wave velocities show the development of anisotropy. With increasing axial strain, the along‐axis velocities tend to increase, while velocities perpendicular to the compression axis tend to decrease (at low pressure) or remain constant (at high pressure). In samples deformed under elevated pressure conditions, acoustic emission event locations are diffuse. Microstructural investigations show an increase in grain chipping and crushing with increasing confining pressure, but no evidence of localized compaction could be observed. The nature of the pore fluid, either decane or water, does not significantly influence the mechanical behavior at strain rates of 10−6 to 10−4 s−1. Grain angularity and grain‐size distribution also did not significantly change the mechanical behavior. We infer that our observations indicate that the lack of cementation introduces additional degrees of freedom for grains to slide, rotate, and reorganize at the sample scale, precluding the existence and sustainability of stress concentrations beyond the grain scale. This results in progressive compaction and hardening, and lack of compaction localization.

Highlights

  • Porous unconsolidated sands and poorly consolidated sandstones constitute important reservoirs targeted for hydrocarbon extraction (e.g., Gulf of Mexico—Li et al, 2003; Ostermeier, 1995; Slochteren Sandstone, Groningen Gas Field, the Netherlands—Hettema et al, 2002)

  • At very low confining pressure, strain localization in porous sandstones has been shown to occur via dilatant shear localization moving to compactant shear localization at low-to-moderate confinement (Wong & Baud, 2012)

  • Decane-saturated test OS-04 was performed at fixed confining pressure steps of 2.5 MPa, while during each step, the sample was allowed to reach a near-steady volumetric strain rate of

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Porous unconsolidated sands and poorly consolidated sandstones (porosity ≥ 20%) constitute important reservoirs targeted for hydrocarbon extraction (e.g., Gulf of Mexico—Li et al, 2003; Ostermeier, 1995; Slochteren Sandstone, Groningen Gas Field, the Netherlands—Hettema et al, 2002). It is their high porosity that makes such reservoirs suitable for fluid production due to the often high permeability.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call