Abstract
The tribological performance of two Fe–Cr–Ni–Si–B–C (Colferoloy) alloy coatings manufactured by HVOF thermal spraying was studied by rubber-wheel dry particle abrasion test and ball-on-disk sliding wear tests. The results were compared to those obtained on Ni–Cr–Fe–Si–B–C and Cr3C2–NiCr layers (also manufactured by HVOF-spraying), hard chromium electroplating and bulk tool steel.At room temperature, the sliding wear loss of the Colferoloy coatings against alumina counterpart, caused by a mix of mild abrasion, delamination and tribo-oxidation, was larger than that of Cr3C2–NiCr and tool steel but lower than that of Ni–Cr–Fe–Si–B–C and hard chromium plating. At 400°C and 700°C, Colferoloy coatings mainly suffered abrasive grooving: they were still superior to Ni–Cr–Fe–Si–B–C but inferior to Cr3C2–NiCr. Against steel, Colferoloy coatings, with limited delamination and negligible wear loss, were comparable to Cr3C2–NiCr and superior to Ni–Cr–Fe–Si–B–C, tool steel and electrolytic hard chromium, although they inflicted quite significant wear to the steel counterbody.Colferoloy coatings were therefore validated as alternatives to Ni-based alloys and electroplated chromium under sliding wear conditions, but appeared unsuitable for particle abrasion resistance.The different sliding wear behaviours of HVOF-sprayed coatings could be explained by coupling micro- and nano-hardness to scratch testing, which reflected cracking resistance and plastic deformability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.