Abstract

ObjectivesWe sought to establish the feasibility of chunking crew resource management (CRM) training into micro-size interventions and to compare different training approaches in the context of micro-learning.DesignWe evaluated whether participants in micro-learning CRM activities achieved learning objectives following training. In a between-subjects design, groups were observed for behaviour during a simulation that was part of a 15-minute modular intervention and tested for recollection afterwards.ParticipantsThe 129 participants recruited for this study were medical students, who already had relevant experience treating patients.InterventionsThe experimental setting involved three 5-minute components: video, simulation, and debriefing. Different groups viewed videos involving different didactic concepts: one group observed a videotaped concrete example of a medical care team applying a CRM tool (example group), and one group observed a videotaped lecture on the same topic (lecture group).Main outcome measuresAll simulations were videotaped and coded in detail for the occurrence of and time spent engaging in team behaviour and medical care. Questionnaires were administered before, immediately after, and two weeks after the intervention. We compared the groups’ behaviour during the simulation (team cooperation and medical care), retention of knowledge from the training content, and results of the evaluation.ResultsBoth groups exhibited most of the behaviours included in the content of the instructional videos during the simulations and recollected information 2 weeks later. The example group exhibited significantly more of the training content during the simulation and demonstrated better retention 2 weeks later. Although the example group spent more time on team coordination, there was no difference in the number of executed medical measures.ConclusionDelivering CRM training in chunks of relatively short and highly standardised interventions appears feasible. In this study, the form of didactical presentation caused a difference in learning success between groups: a traditional lecture was outperformed by an instructional video demonstrating a practical example.

Highlights

  • Team training is considered a crucial factor for patient safety in healthcare [1]

  • Such acronyms support communication and decision making, during critical situations. They may be perceived as timeconsuming in stressful situations and users may tire of using these formal communication processes where an unambiguous procedure exists or a single solution is clearly evident [6]. These potential barriers to acceptance should be considered for healthcare teams, where–unlike aviation crews–staff configurations are more heterogeneous, with a number of subspecialties involved and frequently changing while critical situations may arise multiple times during a typical shift [7]

  • Weller et al developed a structured call-out tool based on SBAR that is individualised for the daily routine of medical teams: Stop; Notify; Assessment; Plan; Priorities; Invite ideas (SNAPPI) [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Team training is considered a crucial factor for patient safety in healthcare [1]. Crew resource management (CRM) has become a leading example of such training. Representative tools in CRM include structured briefing models, such as SBAR (Situation; Background; Assessment; Recommendation) [3–5] and FOR-DEC (Facts; Options; Risks and Benefits; Decision; Execution; Check) [6] Such acronyms support communication and decision making, during critical situations. They may be perceived as timeconsuming in stressful situations and users may tire of using these formal communication processes where an unambiguous procedure exists or a single solution is clearly evident [6] These potential barriers to acceptance should be considered for healthcare teams, where–unlike aviation crews–staff configurations are more heterogeneous, with a number of subspecialties involved and frequently changing while critical situations may arise multiple times during a typical shift [7]. Weller et al developed a structured call-out tool based on SBAR that is individualised for the daily routine of medical teams: Stop; Notify; Assessment; Plan; Priorities; Invite ideas (SNAPPI) [8] This acronym was designed to improve information-sharing within medical teams during crisis situations and to create a shared understanding of the clinical situation. Weller et al were able to teach anaesthetists using SNAPPI through a 15 minute video-based educational intervention

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call