Abstract

To compare three microkeratome-assisted techniques for the preparation of ultrathin (UT) grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. After dissection with a 300-μm microkeratome head in 40 donor tissues, a second cut was performed with a 130-μm head either after manual stromal hydration (group A, n = 10) or osmotic hydration at the eye bank (group B, n = 10) or with a 50- or 90-μm head, depending on residual bed thickness (group C, n = 10); no further dissection was performed in the control group (group D, n = 10). Corneal thickness and endothelial cell (EC) count were determined at all appropriate stages. Statistical analysis was performed using a Fisher exact test. Final graft thicknesses in groups A (89.1 ± 34.1μm), B (84.1 ± 18.6 μm), and C (72.1 ± 10.1 μm) were significantly lower than in group D (201.9 ± 25.3 μm) (P < 0.001). EC loss did not differ significantly among the groups. Multiple areas of Descemet detachment were seen in 4 of 10 corneas of group A. All methods proved equally efficient in producing UT grafts, but stromal hydration induced tissue structural changes. EC loss was unaffected by the additional manipulation required to prepare UT grafts.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.