Abstract

Resolving the question of (1) land plant and (2) vascular land plant evolution is a complex problem. It requires a continued, multidisciplinary effort. We are all grateful to Dianne Edwards and her colleagues (Edwards et al. 1979) for pursuing one such line of research with careful attention to morphology and stratigraphy. Their efforts, however, are confined to one small part of the globe, and they perforce involve only one type of evidence effective with regard to questions of vascular plant evolution once the land estate has been reached. They do not deal with the basic question of vascular and non-vascular land plant origins. The so-called Přidoli benchmark that remained the sine qua nun for vascular plant evolution when Dianne Edwards began her studies has now been irrevocably breached. What other supposedly sacrosanct benchmarks will also crumble as the result of future discoveries, now that vascular plants have been recovered from lower Ludlovian strata? Nevertheless, pre-Devonian plant megafossils are too rare to yield definitive results with regard to the origin of land plants prior to the vascular estate, even though they could in principle (as emphasized by Edwards et al. 1979) provide the least ambiguous evidence. We must look elsewhere than to megafossils for evidence suggesting links in time between green algal ancestors, major groups of living green land Plants, and the many extinct groups of enigmatic higher land plants in the crucial Early Paleozoic time interval.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call