Abstract

With the recent SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, the importance of rapid and direct detection of respiratory disease viruses has been well recognized. The detection of these viruses with novel technologies is vital in timely prevention and treatment strategies for epidemics and pandemics. Respiratory viruses can be detected from saliva, swab samples, nasal fluid, and blood, and collected samples can be analyzed by various techniques. Conventional methods for virus detection are based on techniques relying on cell culture, antigen-antibody interactions, and nucleic acids. However, these methods require trained personnel as well as expensive equipment. Microfluidic technologies, on the other hand, are one of the most accurate and specific methods to directly detect respiratory tract viruses. During viral infections, the production of detectable amounts of relevant antibodies takes a few days to weeks, hampering the aim of prevention. Alternatively, nucleic acid–based methods can directly detect the virus-specific RNA or DNA region, even before the immune response. There are numerous methods to detect respiratory viruses, but direct detection techniques have higher specificity and sensitivity than other techniques. This review aims to summarize the methods and technologies developed for microfluidic-based direct detection of viruses that cause respiratory infection using different detection techniques. Microfluidics enables the use of minimal sample volumes and thereby leading to a time, cost, and labor effective operation. Microfluidic-based detection technologies provide affordable, portable, rapid, and sensitive analysis of intact virus or virus genetic material, which is very important in pandemic and epidemic events to control outbreaks with an effective diagnosis.

Highlights

  • Respiratory tract infections have been a great danger for children, adults, and elders for years

  • Expression of Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies takes place after 3–7 days of infection, and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies can be detectable after 8 days which is the main challenge for the viral detection [299]

  • The most disadvantage of IgG/IgM detection is that produced antibodies can react with crossreactive antibodies that cause false positives of patients without SARS-CoV-2 [299]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Respiratory tract infections have been a great danger for children, adults, and elders for years. Influenza A and B, parainfluenza, adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, human rhinoviruses, Enterovirus 71, bocavirus, and coronavirus are examples that can cause respiratory tract infections [1]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) estimations, 1.9 million children die each year due to acute respiratory infections [2]

Alperay Tarım, Betul Karakuzu and Cemre Oksuz contributed equally to this work
Respiratory Disease Viruses
Conventional virus detection methods
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification
Microarray
Aptamer-based detection
Indirect Detection
Optical detection techniques
Absorbance
Surface plasmon resonance
Fluorescence
Colorimetric
Others
Electrical detection techniques
Other detection techniques
Commercially available microfluidic solutions
Challenges of virus detection
Summary and Outlook
Findings
HAU 5 × 10−4 HAU

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.