Abstract
SummaryThis research article effort to empirically assess the effect of microcredit on household economic welfare consequences, for example income and consumption in rural Pakistan. The valuation is based on the difference‐in‐difference method that is a progressively popular technique of tackling the selection bias issue in measuring the influences of microcredit. This paper uses a 2‐year panel data set, together with both primary and secondary data gained through a household survey in rural Pakistan. Our empirical outcomes favour the full belief in the literature that participates in microcredit programme helps expand households' economic welfare, for example income and consumption. Despite the positive results on how microcredit has improved the rural households' living status, our outcomes display that the huge majority of the program applicants are non‐poor, which casts roughly uncertainties on the social potential (for example poverty alleviation) of Pakistan's microcredit programs. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
