Abstract

BackgroundCurrent research highlights the role of microcirculatory disorders in post-cardiac arrest patients. Affected microcirculation shows not only dissociation from systemic hemodynamics but also strong connection to outcome of these patients. However, only few studies evaluated microcirculation directly during cardiac arrest (CA) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The aim of our experimental study in a porcine model was to describe sublingual microcirculatory changes during CA and CPR using recent videomicroscopic technology and provide a comparison to parameters of global hemodynamics.MethodsCardiac arrest was induced in 18 female pigs (50 ± 3 kg). After 3 min without treatment, 5 min of mechanical CPR followed. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring including systemic blood pressure and carotid blood flow was performed and blood lactate was measured at the end of baseline and CPR. Sublingual microcirculation was assessed by the Sidestream Dark Field (SDF) technology during baseline, CA and CPR. Following microcirculatory parameters were assessed off-line separately for capillaries (≤20 µm) and other vessels: total and perfused vessel density (TVD, PVD), proportion of perfused vessels (PPV), microvascular flow index (MFI) and heterogeneity index (HI).ResultsIn comparison to baseline the CA small vessel microcirculation was only partially preserved: TVD 15.64 (13.59–18.48) significantly decreased to 12.51 (10.57–13.98) mm/mm2, PVD 15.57 (13.56–17.80) to 5.53 (4.17–6.60) mm/mm2, PPV 99.64 (98.05–100.00) to 38.97 (27.60–46.29) %, MFI 3.00 (3.00–3.08) to 1.29 (1.08–1.58) and HI increased from 0.08 (0.00–0.23) to 1.5 (0.71–2.00), p = 0.0003 for TVD and <0.0001 for others, respectively. Microcirculation during ongoing CPR in small vessels reached 59–85 % of the baseline values: TVD 13.33 (12.11–15.11) mm/mm2, PVD 9.34 (7.34–11.52) mm/mm2, PPV 72.34 (54.31–87.87) %, MFI 2.04 (1.58–2.42), HI 0.65 (0.41–1.07). The correlation between microcirculation and global hemodynamic parameters as well as to lactate was only weak to moderate (i.e. Spearman’s ρ 0.02–0.51) and after adjustment for multiple correlations it was non-significant.ConclusionsSublingual microcirculatory parameters did not correlate with global hemodynamic parameters during simulated porcine model of CA and CPR. SDF imaging provides additional information about tissue perfusion in the course of CPR.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12967-016-0934-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Current research highlights the role of microcirculatory disorders in post-cardiac arrest patients

  • To acquire conjunctival microcirculation during cardiac arrest (CA) required longer period than preset, during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) the images of conjunctival microcirculation were of poor quality not sufficient for the analysis, we excluded conjunctival microcirculation from the further analysis

  • Baseline characteristics All animals were stable during baseline, mean arterial blood pressure (ABP) was 86.2 (±11.0) mmHg, Carotid blood flow velocity (CBF) 292.5 (±69.7) mL/min, pulmonary wedge pressure (PWP) 8.9 (±2.6) mmHg, pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) 18.3 (±3.7) mmHg and mean central venous pressure (CVP) was 5.6 (±2.7) mmHg, cardiac output (CO) 5.20 (±0.97) L/min and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR) 15.9 (±3.1) mmHg × min/L

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Current research highlights the role of microcirculatory disorders in post-cardiac arrest patients. Only few studies evaluated microcirculation directly during cardiac arrest (CA) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The aim of our experimental study in a porcine model was to describe sublingual microcirculatory changes during CA and CPR using recent videomicroscopic technology and provide a comparison to parameters of global hemodynamics. In post-cardiac arrest patients a discordance between systemic blood flow and tissue perfusion has been reported [3, 4], and a connection between microcirculation and patients’ outcome has been suggested [3, 5,6,7]. Only few studies have evaluated microcirculation during CA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) [8,9,10,11]. Evaluation of sublingual microcirculatory parameters with the strongest relation to outcome [13, 14] during CPR is still lacking

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call