Abstract

This paper compares three escape strategies for microburst encounters during final landing approach: altitude guidance, maximum angle-of-attack guidance, and constant pitch guidance. Altitude guidance with the lowest possible commanded altitude appears to be the safest strategy in that it yields the lowest probability of crash. Moreover, the safety of this escape strategy is the most robust against variations in microburst size, strength, and location. In the paper, three different approaches are used for the comparison: Deterministic simulations, a semi-analytic approach, and a statistical approach. All three approaches suggest that altitude guidance with the lowest possible commanded altitude is the safest and most robust strategy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.