Abstract

Annually, an estimated 2 million osteoporotic fractures occur in the United States alone. Osteoporosis imparts a great burden on the health care system. The identification of novel regulators of bone health is critical for developing more effective therapeutics. A previous study on the colonization of germ-free (GF) mice with a microbial community has demonstrated that bacterial colonization dramatically increases bone loss. We therefore investigated the impact of multiple microbial communities in different mice to understand how generalizable the impact of bacterial colonization is on bone health. To investigate the impact of different microbial communities on bone health in outbred and inbred mouse strains, gavage was performed on GF Swiss Webster and GF C57BL/6 mice to introduce distinct microbiotas that originated from either humans or mice. GF mice displayed a high degree of colonization, as indicated by more than 90% of the operational taxonomic units present in the starting inoculum being successfully colonized in the mice when they were examined at the end of the experiment. In spite of the successful colonization of GF mice with gut microbiota of either mouse or human origin, bone mass did not change significantly in any of the groups tested. Furthermore, static and dynamic bone parameters and osteoclast precursor and T cell populations, as well as the expression of several inflammatory markers, were mostly unchanged following microbial colonization of GF mice. IMPORTANCE The microbiota has been shown to be an important regulator of health and development. With regard to its effect on bone health, a previous study has suggested that gut microbes negatively impact bone density. However, we show here that this is not generalizable to all microbial communities and mouse strain backgrounds. Our results demonstrate that colonization of mice, both outbred and inbred strains, did not have a major impact on bone health. The identification of microbial communities that do not negatively impact bone health may provide a foundation for future investigations that seek to identify microbes that are either beneficial or detrimental to bone metabolism.

Highlights

  • An estimated 2 million osteoporotic fractures occur in the United States alone

  • To identify specific microbes that affect bone health, we investigated the impact of different human microbial communities in GF mice

  • After 12 weeks of colonization, bone mass in the distal femur was measured, and we found that there was no significant difference between the bone volume fraction (BVF) values of GF mice and mice colonized with our collection of human microbiotas or the cecal content of the mouse (Fig. 1) (P ϭ 0.61)

Read more

Summary

RESULTS

After 12 weeks of colonization, bone mass in the distal femur was measured, and we found that there was no significant difference between the bone volume fraction (BVF) values of GF mice and mice colonized with our collection of human microbiotas or the cecal content of the mouse (Fig. 1) (P ϭ 0.61). Cortical (Ct.) bone parameters, such as volume, thickness, and moment of inertia (MOI), were not significantly different between GF mice and mice colonized with a microbiota (Table S1 in the supplemental material) These data show that colonization of GF mice with human or mouse microbial communities had no impact on bone health in the SW outbred genetic background. Similar to the results for their female counterparts, the presence of a microbiota did not impact the BVF (Fig. 2c) (P ϭ 0.9253) These results demonstrate that neither sex nor genetic background impacts bone mass in response to microbial colonization of GF mice. Conventionalized mice of the C57BL/6 and SW genetic backgrounds shared 154 OTUs, but an additional 31 OTUs were unique to C57BL/6 mice and 168 OTUs were unique to SW mice (Tables S3 and S4)

DISCUSSION
Conclusions
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call