Abstract
Fifty-eight beef primal ribs obtained from carcasses of cattle raised under three feeding regimens (grass, grain-supplemented and grain) were used to compare the quality, chemical, packaging, retail case life and storage characteristics of beef produced at varied levels of forage. Carcasses from grass-fed cattle had lower marbling scores, quality grades and fat percentages than those from grain-fed or grain-supplemented cattle. Percentage moisture was significantly higher in the grass-fed beef. Percentage purge loss, microbial numbers, visual appearance in the retail case and sensory panel characteristics of beef were not significantly influenced by feeding regimen; however, there was a significant interaction between feeding regimen and length of vacuum storage. Beef from grass-fed cattle generally showed greater variability in these traits after 21 days of vacuum storage. Beef from grass-fed cattle generally showed greater variability in these traits after 21 days of vacuum storage than did beef from grain-fed or grain-supplemented cattle. After 150 days of storage at —10 C, TBA values were significantly higher for beef from grass-fed cattle than for samples from grain-fed or grain-supplemented animals. The production of beef at high levels of forage appears to be feasible; however, meat packers and retailers should closely monitor their vacuum packaging and retail case and freezer storage practices to minimize product variability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.