Abstract

Radiological investigations are essential for the diagnosis and classification of fungal rhinosinusitis; however, radiological findings might occasionally be misleading. Computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) complement each other, facilitating clinicians to arrive at a diagnosis. Hence, even with the best radiological modalities, correlation between clinical and microbiological findings is crucial for the accurate diagnosis of fungal rhinosinusitis. In addition, the role of traditional methods such as KOH microscopy and culture should be accurately evaluated. To this end, we aimed to diagnose rhinosinusitis with a fungal etiology based on radiological findings and subsequently correlate these findings with those of microbiological techniques, namely culture and KOH microscopy. A total of 57 clinically suspected fungal rhinosinusitis cases were included in the study. Radiological investigations were performed using either CT or MRI. Tissues samples were processed and analyzed using KOH microscopy and culture. The results of the study suggest that using a single method for the diagnosis of fungal rhinosinusitis is inadequate. Rather, the diagnosis should be based on radiological as well as microbiological findings, especially for cases that are clinically ambiguous.

Highlights

  • Radiological investigations have become a vital tool in the diagnosis and classification of fungal rhinosinusitis

  • Even with the best radiological modalities, correlation between clinical and microbiological findings is crucial for the accurate diagnosis of fungal rhinosinusitis

  • We aimed to diagnose rhinosinusitis with a fungal etiology based on radiological findings and subsequently correlate these findings with those of microbiological techniques, namely culture and KOH microscopy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radiological investigations have become a vital tool in the diagnosis and classification of fungal rhinosinusitis. At times, their findings can be misleading; the presentation in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis is very specific, while in invasive fungal rhinosinusitis, it may range from vague sinusitis to an apparently normal scan. Even with the best radiological modalities, clinical and microbiological parallelism is necessary to accurately diagnose this ambiguous condition known as fungal rhinosinusitis. Fungal rhinosinusitis can be classified as either noninvasive (allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and fungal ball) or invasive (acute invasive, chronic invasive, and granulomatous invasive fungal sinusitis).[2] In this study, we analyzed fungal rhinosinusitis on the basis of radiological diagnosis and correlated the results with those of microbiological techniques, including culture and KOH microscopy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call