Abstract

Functional and biogeographical properties of soil microbial communities in urban ecosystems are poorly understood despite their role in metabolic processes underlying valuable ecosystem services. The worldwide emergence of engineered habitats in urban landscapes—green roofs, bioswales, and other types of soil-based green infrastructure—highlights the importance of understanding how environmental changes affect the community assembly processes that shape urban microbial diversity and function. In this study we investigated (1) whether engineered green roofs and bioswales in New York City had distinct microbial community composition and trait-associated diversity compared to non-engineered soils in parks and tree pits, and (2) if these patterns were consistent with divergent community assembly processes associated with engineered specifications of green infrastructure habitats not present in conventional, non-engineered green infrastructure; specifically, tree pit and park lawn soils. We found that green roofs and bioswales each had distinct bacterial and fungal communities, but that community composition and diversity were not significantly associated with geographic distance, suggesting that the processes structuring these differences are related to aspects of the habitats themselves. Bioswales, and to a lesser extent green roofs, also contained increased functional potential compared to conventional GI soils, based on the diversity and abundance of taxa associated with nitrogen cycling, biodegradation, decomposition, and traits positively associated with plant growth. We discuss these results in the context of community assembly theory, concluding that urban soil microbial community composition and diversity in engineered habitats are driven largely by environmental filtering, whereas stochastic processes are more important among non-engineered soils.

Highlights

  • Understanding the ecological dynamics of urban soil microbiomes is an increasingly practical matter as municipalities expand green infrastructure (GI) programs featuring engineered green spaces designed to restore and enhance ecosystem services (Tzoulas et al, 2007)

  • Our results suggest that anthropogenically-modified, fragmented soils in urban ecosystems contain considerable biodiversity of microbial communities that are compositionally distinct across different types of green infrastructure

  • While this trend was suggested by previous studies, this was the first study to simultaneously analyze multiple green infrastructure types, including engineered and non-engineered soil

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the ecological dynamics of urban soil microbiomes is an increasingly practical matter as municipalities expand green infrastructure (GI) programs featuring engineered green spaces designed to restore and enhance ecosystem services (Tzoulas et al, 2007). Research on Central Park (Ramirez et al, 2014), medians (Reese et al, 2016), and human-altered soils (Huot et al, 2017) in NYC indicate that soil microbial composition is related to microsite differences, especially in relation to edaphic characteristics like pH, nutrient content, and plant associations It remains unclear how site specific differences in GI installations and other urban soil types contribute to biogeographical patterns in the distribution of urban soil microbial taxa. Compared to other urban soils, GI sites have proscribed plant communities, resource and water fluxes associated with stormwater intake, protection from pedestrian traffic, and ongoing monitoring and maintenance (NYC Department of Environmental Protection [DEP], 2017) Despite their proximity to heavily used roads, GI soils have relatively low levels of metal and petroleumderived hydrocarbon contamination (Deeb et al, 2018). There is some evidence to suggest that microbes in GI installations are compositionally distinct, as seen for fungal communities in NYC green roofs compared to city parks (McGuire et al, 2013), and among bacterial communities in different types of bioswales (Joyner et al, 2019)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.