Abstract
Anaerobic biotechnology has been widely used for swine wastewater (SWW) treatment. However, its organic loading rate (OLR) is far lower than expected, mainly because of the low rate of hydrolysis. In this study, the comparative process performance and efficiency of an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor (R1) and an up-flow microaerobic sludge blanket (UMSB) reactor (R2) were evaluated for SWW treatment, operating for 264 days under higher OLRs and lower hydraulic retention times than those found in the literature. The R2 was subjected to the three different air doses: 0.09 (stage I), 0.17 (stage II), and 0.25 (stage III) LO2 Lfeed−1 d−1 aiming at enhancing the hydrolysis step of the anaerobic digestion (AD). The overall results showed that 0.17 LO2 Lfeed−1 d−1 was the best experimental condition evaluated, which provided volatile suspended solids, total chemical oxygen demand, and particulate chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies of 85.0 ± 1.9%, 83.8 ± 2.5%, and 82.1 ± 4.8%, respectively. This performance was due to the higher organic matter hydrolysis, resulting in higher methane production. Therefore, the UMSB reactor treatment was demonstrated to be a feasible alternative for SWW, although some strategies to control biomass washout must be investigated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
