Abstract

Micro-injection moulding (μIM) is a replication-based process enabling the cost-effective production of complex and net-shaped miniaturized plastic components. The micro-scaled size of such parts poses great challenges in assessing their dimensional quality and often leads to time-consuming and unprofitable off-line measurement procedures. In this work, the authors proposed a novel method to verify the quality of a three-dimensional micro moulded component (nominal volume equal to 0.07 mm3) based on the combination of optical micro metrology and injection moulding process monitoring. The most significant dimensional features of the micro part were measured using a focus variation microscope. Their dependency on the variation of µIM process parameters was studied with a Design of Experiments (DoE) statistical approach. A correlation study allowed the identification of the product fingerprint, i.e., the dimensional characteristic that was most linked to the overall part quality and critical for product functionality. Injection pressure and velocity curves were recorded during each moulding cycle to identify the process fingerprint, i.e., the most sensitive and quality-related process indicator. The results of the study showed that the dimensional quality of the micro component could be effectively controlled in-line by combining the two fingerprints, thus opening the door for future µIM in-line process optimization and quality assessment.

Highlights

  • Microsystems are among the main drivers of the technological evolution introduced by the information age

  • The product fingerprint must be sensitive to the variation of process settings in order to work as an optimization tool for μIM; a change of process parameters has to be reflected in a variation of the fingerprint value if an effective control over the process has to be performed

  • The evaluation of such a variability is important since it quantifies the repeatability of the conclusions drawn from the Pareto chart; a low standard deviation of an effect leads to the conclusion that the significance of that effect is robust with respect to process repeatability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Microsystems are among the main drivers of the technological evolution introduced by the information age. Since the positive outcome of any replication process strictly depends on the dimensional accuracy of the master, new micro tooling technologies were developed to manufacture moulds with features having micrometric dimensions [5] Another discrepancy between IM and μIM relates to the filling of the cavity, which becomes much more challenging in the micro-scale. The product fingerprint must be sensitive to the variation of process settings in order to work as an optimization tool for μIM; a change of process parameters has to be reflected in a variation of the fingerprint value if an effective control over the process has to be performed Another typical quality assurance issue of μIM and other moulding processes is that their extremely high throughput rates do not allow for measurement of all the produced parts with three-dimensional instruments [13], and the production is verified by measuring a few random components extracted from the manufactured batch. TThhee mmoosstt iimmppoorrttaanntt ggeeoommeettrriiccaall ppaarrtt ffeeaattuurreess wweerree sseelleecctteedd aanndd tthhee eeffffeeccttss ooff tthhee vvaarriiaattiioonn ooff pprroocceessss ppaarraammeetteerrss wweererestustduidediebdy bayppalypipnlgyainsgtataistsitcaatlisDtiecsaigl nDoefsEigxnpeorifmEenxptse(rDimoEen) taspp(DrooaEch) . aAppcororraeclhat.ioAn csoturrdeylatwioans stthuedny pwearsfothrmenedpetrofoirdmeendtiftyo itdheentfiefaytuthree fbeaetinugre mbeoinstglymcoosrtrlyelcaoterdrelwatietdh wthiethotthheeorsth, eir.es.,, it.hee., ptrhoedupcrtofidnugcetrpfirnignet.rpInr-ilnint.eIpnr-olicneesspmroocneistosrimngonwitaosrainlsgo awpapslieadlsoduarpinpglitehde mduoruilndgintgheexpmeoriumldeinntgs; einxjpeecrtiiomnepnrtse;ssinujreectainond ipnrjeescstuiorne vaenldociintyjecctuiorvnevsewloecrietyancualryvseesdwweirteharnesaplyescetdtowpirtohcreessspveacrtiatotiopnroscaensds vthaeribaetisotnpsraoncedssthfienbgeesrtpprirnotcceassndfiindgaetrepwrianst icdaenndtiidfieadte. wFiansalildye, nthtieficeodr.rFeliantailolny,btehtewceoernretlhaetiopnrobceetsws aenend tphreodpurcotcfienssgearnpdrinptsrowdauscitnvfiensgtiegraptreidnttso ewstaasbliinshveasntigefafteecdtivteoine-sltianbelqisuhalaitny aesfsfeecsstimveenitnp-lrionceedquuraeliftoyr athsseemssimcreonpt aprrto. cedure for the micro part

CCaassee SSttuuddyy
Measurement Strategy and Uncertainty Evaluation
Objective magnification Numerical aperture
Process Monitoring
Product Fingerprint Analysis
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call