Abstract
ObjectiveThe study was built around the objective of determining the variances in the gap and void formation around cemented prefabricated fiber posts with two different cementation materials and techniques with micro-computed tomography (μCT). MethodsStandardized acrylic resin roots (N = 40) with prefabricated fiber posts (RelyX™ Fiber Post 3D) were split into four sets (n = 10) based on many types of cementation materials and techniques. In the first group, resin cement (RelyX™ Unicem) was inserted to the canals via root canal tips. In the second group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. In the third group, dual polymerizing resin cement (MultiCore® Flow) was injected into the canals by using root canal tips. In the fourth group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. The gap and void formation in the cement and the root canals was evaluated with μCT. IBM SPSS Statistics was used to perform the statistical evaluation, then the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality and Kruskal-Wallis H test to compare these variables with respect to the all groups significant difference (a = 0.05). ResultsThe study outlined no difference of significance when evaluating the gap and void formation within the experimental groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionThere was a certain amount of void and gap formation inside all of the tested specimens. However, no significant variances were found.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.