MICRO- AND MACROGENESIS OF SEMANTIC ARCHITECTONICS OF CONSCIOUSNESS

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to highlight the genetic and functional plans of the semantic architectonics of human consciousness. The procedure of theoretical and methodological research is based on the methodological background of the genetic and modeling approach of S.D. Maksymenko, cultural and historical concept of L.S. Vyhotskyi, activity and system paradigms. It is defined the concept of “semantic architectonics of consciousness” as a multidimensional semantic construction that “puts” traces of fixed previous interactions and attitudes into events and situations in the semantic fields and mnemic contexts. It is specified that the “world picture” is a system of variable and objective cases of conceptualization of semantic architectonics of individual’s consciousness - intentionally activated dynamic semantic network with multiformat structure of plurality of individually set images of the world and oneself in it and hierarchical semantic connections (relations) between all specific elements that make up partial images and the network as a whole. The sources of the unique emotional color of crystallized patterns are revealed. These sources determine the detail and scale of a person’s subjective reality, his or her subjective personal response to the influence of objective reality. It is proved that the genesis of new semantic connections creates internal conditions to act in an active way, changing one's life world (subjective reality), “setting” it for the real world in a more specific way. It is substantiated the procedural chain of finding of the meaning, the progress-movement of which as an instrument of man’s discovery of oneself and the world, has a transitional but inverse form, namely: “world” ← → “unconscious connotations of non-verbal experiences” that have somatopsychic manifestation ← → “necessity” ← → “interiorisation” (which is combined with the selectivity of perception of another person due to the action of imprintings and mnemic contexts) ← → “intention” ← → “attitude, activity” ← → “understanding and interpretation” ← → “meaning” ← → objectified “intersubjective meaning” ← → “world”.