Abstract

As is well known, Blow-Up (1966) directed by Michelangelo Antonioni is based on Julio Cortázar’s short story; “Las babas del diablo” (1959). In literary terms, it is very difficult to find similarities between both works, except in their outlines. Many critics, therefore, thought Blow-Up was Antonioni’s own film with no special connection with “Las babas del diablo”. But we should focus on the common outlines of the two. Both deal with ‘vision’. The change of seeing through a viewfinder to seeing through a photographic print gives the protagonists a daydream-like experience. Cortázar was not only a writer but also an amateur photographer, and Antonioni a film director. If both auteurs reveal their interest in ‘vison’ in their works, we can say that Antonioni follows Cortázar regarding this theme and further develops it through his use of abstract paintings. Antonioni was concerned with differences between the vision of the naked eye and photographic vision, and with similarities between the photographic vision and abstract painting. So, what is Antonioni’s understanding of vision? I think there is a key to resolve this question in Blow-Up itself. One can focus on not only the change of the protagonist’s behavior in following the story’s development, but also on photographs, abstract paintings, and landscape paintings that appear in the film. Then we would find the possibility that Antonioni thinks photographs and pointillist paintings are based on the same principle; the retinal mesh-like structure. Article received: April 10, 2019; Article accepted: June 5, 2019; Published online: September 15, 2019; Original scholarly paper

Highlights

  • Near the end of Blow-Up (1966), there is a scene where the painter’s lover says to the hero “It looks like one of Bill’s paintings” while viewing an exaggeratedly blownup blot from a photograph that the photographer thinks shows a dead body (Figure 1)

  • When we focus on the photographs, abstract paintings, landscape paintings, that appear in Blow-Up, we will be able to find the possibilities that Antonioni has a unique thought that photography and pointillist abstract paintings are similar in visual forms

  • Optical Art, which became popular about the same time as Blow-Up, was a good example of this

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Near the end of Blow-Up (1966), there is a scene where the painter’s lover says to the hero “It looks like one of Bill’s paintings” while viewing an exaggeratedly blownup blot from a photograph that the photographer thinks shows a dead body (Figure 1). Antonioni was concerned with differences between the vision of the naked eye and photographic vision, and with similarities between the photographic vision and abstract painting.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.