Abstract

Abstract The poetry produced by the two British women who lived and wrote together in the late nineteenth century under the joint pseudonym ‘Michael Field’ has been regarded as a univocal product by its admirers and detractors alike. Yet such a reading of their work, although encouraged by the authors themselves, tends to homogenise it and disguise the much more dynamic dialogic structure that sustains it. This structure stems from the real differences between the two poets, which have always been played down in an attempt to deflect attention from the dynamic nature of their lesbian relationship

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.