Abstract

The cognitive historical approach to the history of science provides a methodological approach which makes it possible to take into account most of the factors which were constitutive in the formation of scientific meaning in scientific concept formation. In this article this approach is linked with a methodology of metaphorical hermeneutics in order to determine the role played by religious factors in the meaning of scientific concepts. Contrary to traditional approaches in which religious factors are primarily seen as confessional in nature, the term religious is utilized here to identify those absolute presuppositions which fulfil a controlling or regulative function in scientific concept formation and theorizing. 'This approach is applied to a case study of the relationship of faith and science in the work of the nineteenth century British physicist, Michael Faraday. This approach provides an analysis of the change in conceptual structure which the concept of force undergoes in a transition from a mechanistic to a dynamistic metaphysical framework. In this analysis attention is also given to the distinction between confessional religious factors, metaphysical frameworks, meta-scientific principles and theories.

Highlights

  • 'This approach is applied to a case study o f the relationship o f fa ith and science in the work o f the nineteenth century British physicist, M ichael Faraday

  • This approach provides an analysis o f the change in conceptual structure which the concept o f force undergoes in a transition from a mechanistic to a dynamistic metaphysical fram ew ork

  • In this analysis attention is given to the distinction between confessional religious factors, metaphysical frameworks, meta-scientific principles a n d theories

Read more

Summary

Die konteks van ontwikkeling

Argumente dat geloof wetenskaplike teorievonning intrinsiek beinvloed, blyk dikwels in gebreke te bly w anneer aangetoon moet w ord ju is hoe hierdie bei'nvloeding plaasvind. Hierdie m eto­ dologiese benadering, wat origens dikwels in die literatuur oor hierdie saak aangetref word, beredeneer dus die feit dat indien die wetenskaplike op een o f ander wyse sy w etenskaplike teorievonning laat lei o f beinvloed deur denkbeelde wat hulle oorsprong aan die Bybel, geloof o f die teologie ontleen, dan sou dit blyke wees van die deurwerking van geloof in die wetenskap. Dit is die bedoeling om in hierdie artikel 'n variant van die sterker tese te verdedig, een waarin naamlik geargumenteer word dat daar in die metafisiese raamwerk dikwels juis kontrole-oortuigings voorkom w at in die ontwikkeling van die wetenskaplike teorieë en die betekenisgenerering van die kem begrippe van die teorie, 'n regulatiewe o f ‘religieuse’ funksie vervul. Dit sal gedoen word deur aan te toon dat wêreldbeskoulike geloofsoortuigings via kontrole-oortuigings wat werksaam is in metateoretiese raamwerke, wetenskaplike teorievorming beïnvloed tot op die vlak van w etenskaplike begripsvorming in empiriese en eksperimentele werk. Voordat egter daartoe oorgegaan word, eers enkele opmerkings oor die voorgestelde metodologie

M etaforiese hermeneutiek
Religieuse kontrole-oortuigings
Faraday se probleem
Faraday en die ontwykende ‘kragte’ van die natuur
Faraday se veldkonsepsie
Die probleem gestel
Faraday se religieuse oortuigings: die Cantor-tese
Die krag-metafoor: twee letterlike lesings?
Religieuse kontrole-oortuigings in Faraday se wetenskap
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call