Abstract

The immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two influenza vaccines were evaluated in a randomised, double-blind trial in north-east Italy during winter 2005–2006. Of 238 adult subjects (18–60 years of age) with underlying chronic diseases, 120 received MF59-adjuvanted subunit vaccine (Sub/MF59) and 118 received conventional subunit vaccine (Subunit). At 4 weeks post-vaccination, geometric mean titres (GMT) were significantly ( P < 0.001) increased for both groups. For the A/H3N2 and B strains, significantly ( P < 0.02) higher GMT were reported for the Sub/MF59 group. The mean-fold increase in titre, the percentage of subjects with at least a four-fold titre increase and the seroprotection rate (≥1:40) were also higher in the Sub/MF59 group, with the seroprotection rate and four-fold titre increase achieving significance ( P = 0.002 and P = 0.02, respectively) for the A/H3N2 strain. Our results suggest that adults affected by chronic diseases can mount a satisfactory immune response to influenza vaccines, and that these vaccines are well tolerated. Addition of the MF59-adjuvant, however, enhances the immunogenicity of subunit influenza vaccine, conferring superior protection than a conventional subunit vaccine in this population, who are at high-risk of influenza-related complications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.