Abstract
In April 2009, Mexican, American, and Canadian authorities announced a novel influenza that became the first pandemic of the century. We report on lessons learned in Mexico. The Mexican Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Plan, developed and implemented since 2005, was a decisive element for the early response. Major lessons-learned were the need for flexible plans that consider different scenarios; the need to continuously strengthen routine surveillance programs and laboratory capacity and strengthen coordination between epidemiological departments, clinicians, and laboratories; maintain strategic stockpiles; establish a fund for public health emergencies; and collaboration among neighboring countries. Mexico responded with immediate reporting and transparency, implemented aggressive control measures and generous sharing of data and samples. Lessons learned induced changes leading to a better response to public health critical events.
Highlights
In 2009, the Mexican Federal Government was prepared to detect and respond rapidly to the emerging threat from the A(H1N1)pdm[09] influenza virus
Weak regulatory and logistic frameworks: The strategic stockpile of oseltamivir was stored in bulk powder containers, with the Pandemic Influenza Response Plan (PIRP) stipulating that reconstitution would be carried out at Institute of Epidemiological Diagnosis and Reference (InDRE) and the Public Health State Laboratories (PHSL) network
Response and preparedness are a must: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 105,700-395,600 people worldwide died from a cause associated with AH1N1pdm[09] influenza; 80% of deaths are estimated to have occurred in people younger than 65 years of age.[11,12,13]
Summary
In 2009, the Mexican Federal Government was prepared to detect and respond rapidly to the emerging threat from the A(H1N1)pdm[09] influenza virus. On April 14 and 15, 2009, the Ministry of Health (MOH) received notification of pneumonia cases affecting mostly young adults from Oaxaca, San Luis Potosı, and Mexico City Samples from these cases were analyzed at the Laboratory for Epidemiological Surveillance of the Institute of Epidemiological Diagnosis and Reference (InDRE); either the result was negative or found to be positive for influenza “A” using Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) but could not be further subtyped. Pandemic preparedness collaboration among private businesses with the public sector is critically important This mechanism failed to provide vaccines on time for the Mexican population.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
