Abstract

The regulatory approach of international conventions on the transport of goods regarding some important issues in the field of electronic transport documents, such as the legal recognition of electronic transport documents, their functions and legal force makes the subject of analysis in this paper. The overall reach and limitations of the relevant convention rules are also included in the analysis. Conventions in the field of transport of goods, neither conceptually nor in terms of important issues, do not approach the problem of legal regulation of electronic transport documents in the same manner. While some conventions try to approach this problem systematically, in some branches of transport, the conventions are still applicable which, with their content, only implicitly enable the use of electronic transport documents. Regarding the completeness of the regulation of this matter, the Rotterdam Rules and the Additional Protocol to the CMR Convention stand out, but they differ in terms of the adequacy of regulation and final reach. The Rotterdam Rules, despite a very ambitious approach, have failed to adequately resolve the most challenging issue of this entire matter, which is the effective accomplishing of the subject matter-legal functions of a portable electronic record, which greatly reduced its ultimate reach. On the other hand, the Additional Protocol established a completely satisfactory legal foundations for the application of electronic transport documents in road transport.

Highlights

  • Та­ко се eC­MR про­то­ко­лом утвр­ђу­ју оба­ве­зу­ју­ћи усло­ви за функ­ци­о­нал­но из­јед­на­ча­ва­ње елек­трон­ских пре­во­зних ис­пра­ва са њи­хо­вим па­пир­ним пан­да­ни­ма, док се Ро­тер­дам­ским пра­ви­ли­ма као оп­шти услов по­ста­ва­ља по­што­ва­ње уго­во­ре­не про­це­ду­ре, при че­му се на­во­де пи­та­ња ко­ја би тре­ба­ла би­ти пред­мет уго­во­ра о прев­ о­зу у том кон­ тек­сту

  • Док Ро­тер­ дам­ска пра­ви­ла пред­ста­вља­ју по­ку­шај це­ло­ви­те уни­фи­ка­ци­је по­мор­ског пра­ва на ме­ђу­на­род­ном ни­воу, где су елек­трон­ске пре­во­зне ис­пра­ве са­мо једaн сег­мент ши­ро­ко за­сно­ва­не кон­вен­ци­је, до­тле је eC­MR про­то­кол, са­ гла­сно име­ну, ис­кљу­чи­во спе­ци­ја­ли­стич­ки усме­рен на ко­ри­шће­ње елек­трон­ ске ко­му­ни­ка­ци­је и елек­трон­ских пре­во­зних ис­пра­ва у друм­ском са­о­бра­ћа­ ју

  • Uni­ted Na­ti­ons Con­ven­tion on Con­tracts for the In­ter­na­ti­o­nal Car­ri­a­ge of Go­ods Wholly or Partly by Sea, https://www.un­ci­tral.or­g/pd­f/en­glish/texts/tran­sport/ rot­ter­dam_ru­les/Rot­ter­dam-Ru­les-E.pd­f, 12 ја­ну­ар 2021

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Са­гла­сно то­ме, пи­та­ње из­ри­чи­тог прав­ног при­зна­ња елек­трон­ских пре­во­зних ис­пра­ва у ме­ђу­на­род­ним кон­вен­ци­ја­ма из обла­сти пре­во­за ро­бе су­штин­ски се мо­же по­ста­ви­ти са­мо за но­ви­је пред­мет­не кон­вен­ци­је. Та­ко се eC­MR про­то­ко­лом утвр­ђу­ју оба­ве­зу­ју­ћи усло­ви за функ­ци­о­нал­но из­јед­на­ча­ва­ње елек­трон­ских пре­во­зних ис­пра­ва са њи­хо­вим па­пир­ним пан­да­ни­ма, док се Ро­тер­дам­ским пра­ви­ли­ма као оп­шти услов по­ста­ва­ља по­што­ва­ње уго­во­ре­не про­це­ду­ре, при че­му се на­во­де пи­та­ња ко­ја би тре­ба­ла би­ти пред­мет уго­во­ра о прев­ о­зу у том кон­ тек­сту.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.