Abstract

In Europe, the implementation of the Water Framework Directive WFD, in 2001, marks a strong standpoint. In addition to its objectives of a return to good chemical and good ecological status by the year 2015, it fixes the achievement of trends over space and time. The new requirements that arise from the WFD put considerable financial pressure on water management authorities. Because the overall decision-making process relies most of the time on acquired data, it puts considerable pressures on the display of high quality biological as well as chemical environmental measurements. However, performing measurements implies that i) the demonstration of their metrological traceability ii) the evidence of their achievement thanks to accurate and sensitive analytical methods and iii) their statement with a reliable estimate of expanded uncertainty is thoroughly addressed. Moreover, the measurement representativeness, especially in highly dynamic environment, is of prime interest in a context where comparability over space and time is needed. As a consequence, considerable challenges are dwelt on metrologists with great emphasis on parameters that are under regulation. This paper will discuss a panorama of the unavoidable metrological questions that have to be addressed: from the definition of the measurand to the final estimation of uncertainty; from the initial performances demonstration of methods to the final demonstration of mastery and capabilities through inter comparison laboratories and reference materials. A focus will be made on upcoming alternative monitoring approaches that are seldom addressed from a metrological point of view.

Highlights

  • In Europe, the implementation of the Water Framework Directive WFD, in 2001, marks a strong standpoint

  • It may be stated that a widespread contamination of environment by hundreds to thousands various chemicals, physicals and biologicals pressures exists. 1.1 Water Framework Directive The WFD (2000/60/EC) [1], in addition to its objectives of a return to good chemical and good ecological status by the year 2015, fixes the achievement of trends over space and time

  • We highlight that: - metrologists in the field of environmental chemistry are urgently asked to address the issues of traceability to ensure more comparable measurements to satisfy these nowadays need

Read more

Summary

Description of the case study

On the basis of information available on certificates of reference materials provided by suppliers for nonylphenols, theoretical calculations were conducted aiming at demonstrating how accuracy of measurement can be affected by the calibration. Lab and Lab took into account the purity of the standard, as stated by the certificate, in the estimate of the concentration. The Lab 3 that applied the most rigorous methodology, similar as the one in use in national metrology institute NMI, showed measurement that seemed underestimated (a) by comparison to the others their results are the most accurate ones (b). These observations highlight that not taking into account properly the purity of standards used in the calibration process may impair the comparability of measurements. The less the purity of the standard is, the more the influence will be, if it is not taken into account in the calibration process

Metrological challenges for upcoming field measurements in aquatic ecosystems
Accuracy of measurements
Findings
Conclusion and Perspectives
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.