Abstract

Intelligent cooperative multiagent systems are applied for solving a large range of real-life problems, including in domains like biology and healthcare. There are very few metrics able to make an effective measure of the machine intelligence quotient. The most important drawbacks of the designed metrics presented in the scientific literature consist in the limitation in universality, accuracy, and robustness. In this paper, we propose a novel universal metric called MetrIntSimil capable of making an accurate and robust symmetric comparison of the similarity in intelligence of any number of cooperative multiagent systems specialized in difficult problem solving. The universality is an important necessary property based on the large variety of designed intelligent systems. MetrIntSimil makes a comparison by taking into consideration the variability in intelligence in the problem solving of the compared cooperative multiagent systems. It allows a classification of the cooperative multiagent systems based on their similarity in intelligence. A cooperative multiagent system has variability in the problem solving intelligence, and it can manifest lower or higher intelligence in different problem solving tasks. More cooperative multiagent systems with similar intelligence can be included in the same class. For the evaluation of the proposed metric, we conducted a case study for more intelligent cooperative multiagent systems composed of simple computing agents applied for solving the Symmetric Travelling Salesman Problem (STSP) that is a class of NP-hard problems. STSP is the problem of finding the shortest Hamiltonian cycle/tour in a weighted undirected graph that does not have loops or multiple edges. The distance between two cities is the same in each opposite direction. Two classes of similar intelligence denoted IntClassA and IntClassB were identified. The experimental results show that the agent belonging to IntClassA intelligence class is less intelligent than the agents that belong to the IntClassB intelligence class.

Highlights

  • Intelligent cooperative multiagent systems (ICMASs) are applied for a large diversity of difficult real-life problem solving tasks [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • We present a novel universal metric proposed for the accurate and robust symmetric comparison of the similarity in intelligence of two or more than two CMASs specialized in difficult problem solving

  • We considered as possible central intelligence indicators, and the calculation as the means of intelligence indicators sample data in the parametric case and as the medians in the nonparametric case

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intelligent cooperative multiagent systems (ICMASs) are applied for a large diversity of difficult real-life problem solving tasks [1,2,3,4,5,6]. We have not found in the scientific literature an effective metric that includes all of the considerations previously mentioned, able to simultaneously compare the similarity in intelligence of any number (even more than two) cooperative multiagent systems. With this purpose, we propose a novel metric called MetrIntSimil that is capable of making an accurate and robust symmetric comparison of the similarity in intelligence of two or more than two cooperative multiagent systems, taking into consideration the variability in the intelligence of the multiagent systems.

Intelligent Cooperative Multiagent Systems
Metrics for Measuring the Machine Intelligence
Description of the MetrIntSimil Metric
Symmetric Travelling Salesman Problem Solving
CMASs That Operate by Mimicking Biological Ants
The Experimental Setup
Discussion and Comparison of the MetrIntSimil Metric
Theory of Multiple Intelligences in Machines
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.