Metric Theories of Gravity and their Astrophysical Implications

Metric theories of gravity are compiled and classified according to the types of gravitational fields they contain, and the modes of interaction among those fields. The gravitation theories considered are classified as (1) general relativity, (2) scalar-tensor theories, (3) conformally flat theories, and (4) stratified theories with conformally flat space slices. The post-Newtonian limit of each theory is constructed and its Parametrized Post-Newtonian (PPN) values are obtained by comparing it with Will's version of the formalism. Results obtained here, when combined with experimental data and with recent work by Nordtvedt and Will and by Ni, show that, of all theories thus far examined by our group, the only currently viable ones are general relativity, the Bergmann-Wagoner scalar-tensor theory and its special cases (Nordtvedt; Brans-Dicke-Jordan), and a recent, new vector-tensor theory by Nordtvedt, Hellings, and Will.

Increasing sophistication and precision of experimental tests of relativistic gravitation theories has led to the need for a detailed theoretical framework for analysing and interpreting these experiments. Such a framework is the Parametrized Post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism, which treats the post-Newtonian limit of arbitrary metric theories of gravity in terms of nine metric parameters, whose values vary from theory to theory. The theoretical and experimental foundations of the PPN formalism are laid out and discussed, and the detailed definitions and equations for the formalism are given. It is shown that some metric theories of gravity predict that a massive, self-gravitating body's passive gravitational mass should not be equal to its inertial mass, but should be an anisotropic tensor which depends on the body's self-gravitational energy (violation of the principle of equivalence). Two theorems are presented which probe the theoretical structure of the PPN formalism. They state that (i) a metric theory of gravity possesses post-Newtonian integral conservation laws if and only if its nine PP parameters have values which satisfy a set of seven constraint equations, and (ii) a metric theory of gravity is invariant under asymptotic Lorentz transformations if and only if its PPN parameters satisfy a set of three constraint equations. Some theories of gravity (including Whitehead's theory and theories which violate one of the Lorentz-invariance parameter constraints) are shown to predict an anisotropy in the Newtonian gravitational constant. Gravimeter data on the tides of the solid Earth are used to put an upper limit on the magnitude of the predicted anisotropy, and thence to rule out such theories.

The "PPN formalism"-which encompasses the post-Newtonian limit of nearly every metric theory of gravity-is used to analyze stellar stability. This analysis enables one to infer, for any given gravitation theory, the extent to which post-Newtonian effects induce instabilities in white dwarfs, in neutron stars, and in supermassive stars. It also reveals the extent to which our current empirical knowledge of post-Newtonian gravity (based on solar-system experiments) actually guarantees that relativistic instabilities exist. In particular, it shows that (i) for "conservative theories of gravity," current solar-system experiments guarantee that the critical adiabatic index, t, for the stability of stars against radial pulsations exceeds the Newtonian value of : 1' = 43 + 2KM/R, K positive and of order unity; this ensures the existence of the "relativistic instability"; (ii) for "nonconservative theories," current experiments do not permit any firm conclusion about the sign of it - 4 (iii) in the PPN approximation to every metric theory, the standard Schwarzschild criterion for convection is valid. Subject headings: gravitation - instabilities - interiors, stellar - neutron stars - relativity - white dwarf stars

After an introduction to theories of gravity alternative to general relativity, metric theories (Sec. 1) and the parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism (Sec. 2), we define a new class of metric theories of gravity (Sec. 3). It turns out that the post-Newtonian approximation of these new theories is not described by the PPN formalism (Sec. 4); in fact, in the limit of weak field and slow motions, the post-Newtonian expression of the metric tensor contains an, a priori, infinite set of new terms and correspondingly an, a priori, infinite set of new PPN parameters. As a consequence, the parametrized post-Newtonian formulas describing the classical relativistic tests should include these new parameters, and therefore the experimental values of the classical relativistic effects should not be used to put limits only on the standard ten PPN parameters. Finally, we note that a subset of this new class of theories has the same post-Newtonian limit and value of the PPN parameters as general relativity, and therefore is automatically in agreement with the classical general-relativistic tests (Sec. 4, theory III).

This thesis presents theoretical frameworks for the analysis and testing of gravitation theories - both metric and non-metric. For non-metric theories, the high-precision Eotvos-Dicke-Braginskii (EDB) experiments are demonstrated to be powerful tests of their gravitational coupling to electromagnetic interactions. All known non-metric theories are ruled out to within the precision of the EDB experiments. We present a new metric theory of gravity that cannot be distinguished from general relativity in all current and planned solar system experiments. However, this theory has very different gravitational-wave properties. Hence, we point out the need for further tests of metric theories beyond the Parametrized Post-Newtonian formalism, and emphasize the importance of the observation of gravitational waves as a tool for testing relativistic gravity in the future. A theory-independent formalism delineating the properties of weak, plane gravitational waves in metric theories is set up. General conservation laws that follow from variational principles in metric theories of gravity are investigated.

We present a package for the computer algebra system Mathematica, which implements the parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism. This package, named xPPN, is built upon the widely used tensor algebra package suite xAct, and in particular the package xTensor therein. The main feature of xPPN is to provide functions to perform a proper 3+1 decomposition of tensors, as well as a perturbative expansion in so-called velocity orders, which are central tasks in the PPN formalism. Further, xPPN implements various rules for quantities appearing in the PPN formalism, which aid in perturbatively solving the field equations of any metric theory of gravity. Besides Riemannian geometry, also teleparallel and symmetric teleparallel geometry are implemented.

From a parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) perspective, we address the question of whether or not the new degrees of freedom represented by the PPN potentials can lead to significant modifications in the dynamics of galaxies in the direction of rendering dark matter obsolete. Here, we focus on the study of rotation curves associated with spherically symmetric configurations. The values for the post-Newtonian parameters, which help us to classify the different metric theories of gravity, are tightly constrained, mainly by Solar System experiments. Such restrictions render the modifications of gravitational effects, with respect to general relativity (GR), to be insignificant, making attempts to find alternative metrical theories rather fruitless. However, in recent years, metric theories characterized by screening mechanisms have become popular, due to the fact that they lead to the possibility of modifications in larger scales than the Solar System while retaining the success of GR on it, allowing for violations of the constraints of the post-Newtonian parameters. In such a context, we consider here two kinds of solutions for field equations: (i) Vacuum solutions (i.e., when no matter fields are present) and (ii) fields in the presence of a polytropic distribution of matter. For case (i), we find that the post-Newtonian corrections do not lead to modifications significant enough to be considered an alternative to the dark matter hypothesis. In case (ii), we find that for a wide range of values for the PPN parameters $\ensuremath{\gamma}$, $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\le}1$, $\ensuremath{\xi}\ensuremath{\ge}0$, ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{3}$, ${\ensuremath{\zeta}}_{1}$, and ${\ensuremath{\zeta}}_{2}$, the need for dark matter is unavoidable in order to find flat rotation curves. It is only for theories in which ${\ensuremath{\zeta}}_{3}g0$, or $\ensuremath{\beta}g1$, or $\ensuremath{\xi}l0$ that some resemblance of flat rotation curves is found. But the latter two require some direct fine-tuning of the screening radius ${r}_{c}$, while ${\ensuremath{\zeta}}_{3}g0$ implies the most sound modifications. The latter suggests, at least for the models considered, that these are the only theories (consistent with the usual PPN approach) capable of replacing dark matter as a possible explanation for the dynamics of galaxies.

Einstein’s theory of gravity has been extensively tested on solar system scales, and for isolated astrophysical systems, using the perturbative framework known as the parameterized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism. This framework is designed for use in the weak-field and slow-motion limit of gravity, and can be used to constrain a large class of metric theories of gravity with data collected from the aforementioned systems. Given the potential of future surveys to probe cosmological scales to high precision, it is a topic of much contemporary interest to construct a similar framework to link Einstein’s theory of gravity and its alternatives to observations on cosmological scales. Our approach to this problem is to adapt and extend the existing PPN formalism for use in cosmology. We derive a set of equations that use the same parameters to consistently model both weak fields and cosmology. This allows us to parameterize a large class of modified theories of gravity and dark energy models on cosmological scales, using just four functions of time. These four functions can be directly linked to the background expansion of the universe, first-order cosmological perturbations, and the weak-field limit of the theory. They also reduce to the standard PPN parameters on solar system scales. We illustrate how dark energy models and scalar-tensor and vector-tensor theories of gravity fit into this framework, which we refer to as ‘parameterized post-Newtonian cosmology’ (PPNC).

We propose the almost-geodesic motion of self-gravitating test bodies as a possible selection rule among metric theories of gravity. Starting from a heuristic statement, the ``gravitational weak equivalence principle,'' we build a formal operative test able to probe the validity of the principle for any metric theory of gravity in an arbitrary number of spacetime dimensions. We show that, if the theory admits a well-posed variational formulation, this test singles out only the purely metric theories of gravity. This conclusion reproduces known results in the cases of general relativity (as well as with a cosmological constant term) and scalar-tensor theories, but extends also to debated or unknown scenarios, such as the $f(R)$ and Lanczos-Lovelock theories. We thus provide new tools going beyond the standard methods, where the latter turn out to be inconclusive or inapplicable.

I show that several observable properties of bursting neutron stars in metric theories of gravity can be calculated using only conservation laws, Killing symmetries, and the Einstein equivalence principle, without requiring the validity of the general relativistic field equations. I calculate, in particular, the gravitational redshift of a surface atomic line, the touchdown luminosity of a radius-expansion burst, which is believed to be equal to the Eddington critical luminosity, and the apparent surface area of a neutron star as measured during the cooling tails of bursts. I show that, for a general metric theory of gravity, the apparent surface area of a neutron star depends on the coordinate radius of the stellar surface and on its gravitational redshift in the exact same way as in general relativity. On the other hand, the Eddington critical luminosity depends also on an additional parameter that measures the degree to which the general relativistic field equations are satisfied. These results can be used in conjunction with current and future high-energy observations of bursting neutron stars to test general relativity in the strong-field regime.

Within the parameterized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism, there could be an anisotropy of local gravity induced by an external matter distribution, even for a fully conservative metric theory of gravity. It reflects the breakdown of the local position invariance of gravity and, within the PPN formalism, is characterized by the Whitehead parameter ξ. We present three different kinds of observation, from the Solar system and radio pulsars, to constrain it. The most stringent limit comes from recent results on the extremely stable pulse profiles of solitary millisecond pulsars, that gives (95% CL), where the hat denotes the strong-field generalization of ξ. This limit is six orders of magnitude more constraining than the current best limit from superconducting gravimeter experiments. It can be converted into an upper limit of ∼4 × 10−16 on the spatial anisotropy of the gravitational constant.Communicated by C M Will

We develop the parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism, which encompasses the weak-field, slow-motion regime, known as the post-Newtonian limit, of a wide range of metric theories of gravity. Ten PPN parameters are introduced, whose values depend upon the theory of gravity under study. We show that general properties of metric theories of gravity may be reflected in specific values of the PPN parameters, including the presence or absence of a preferred universal frame of reference, and the presence or absence of global conservation laws for energy, momentum and angular momentum.

The confrontation between general relativity and experiment: An update

Conservation of energy, momentum, and angular momentum in metric theories of gravity is studied extensively both in Lagrangian formulations (using generalized Bianchi identities) and in the post-Newtonian limit of general metric theories. Our most important results are the following: (i) The matter response equations $T_{}^{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}{}_{;\ensuremath{\nu}}{}^{}=0$ of any Lagrangian-based, generally covariant metric theory (LBGCM theory) are a consequence of the gravitational-field equations if and only if the theory contains no absolute variables. (ii) Almost all LBGCM theories possess conservation laws of the form $\ensuremath{\theta}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{}{}_{}{}^{\ensuremath{\nu}}{}_{,\ensuremath{\nu}}{}^{}{}_{}{}^{}=0$ (where $\ensuremath{\theta}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{}{}_{}{}^{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ reduces to $T_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{}{}_{}{}^{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ in the absence of gravity). (iii) $\ensuremath{\theta}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{}{}_{}{}^{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ is always expressible in terms of a superpotential, $\ensuremath{\theta}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{}{}_{}{}^{\ensuremath{\nu}}=\ensuremath{\Lambda}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{}{}_{}{}^{[\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\alpha}]}{}_{,\ensuremath{\alpha}}{}^{}{}_{}{}^{}$, If the superpotential $\ensuremath{\Lambda}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{}{}_{}{}^{[\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\alpha}]}$ can be expressed in terms of asymptotic values of field quantities, then the conserved integral ${P}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}=\ensuremath{\int}\ensuremath{\theta}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{}{}_{}{}^{\ensuremath{\nu}}{d}^{3}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ can be measured by experiments confined to the asymptotically flat region outside the source. (iv) In the Will-Nordtvedt ten-parameter post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism there exists a conserved ${P}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ if and only if the parameters obey five specific constraints; two additional constraints are needed for the existence of a conserved angular momentum ${J}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$ (This modifies and extends a previous result due to Will.) (v) We conjecture that for metric theories of gravity, the conservation of energy-momentum is equivalent to the existence of a Lagrangian formulation; and using the PPN formalism, we prove the post-Newtonian limit of this conjecture. (vi) We present "stress-energy-momentum complexes" $\ensuremath{\theta}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{}{}_{}{}^{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ for all currently viable metric theories known to us.

view Abstract Citations (5) References (8) Co-Reads Similar Papers Volume Content Graphics Metrics Export Citation NASA/ADS Relativistic tidal forces. Nordtvedt, K. Abstract The post-Newtonian, relativistic (1/c-squared) tidal force is calculated within the general PPN framework of all metric theories of gravity. There are no relativistic tides in general relativity, but they are generally nonzero in other metric theories of gravity, including scalar-tensor theories. In close binaries, such as the binary pulsar system PSR 1913+16, the relativistic tides can be orders of magnitude larger than Newtonian tides. In 'preferred frame' theories of gravity in which the PPN coefficient alpha(1) is nonzero, the relativistic tidal field is not the gradient of a scalar potential, but includes also a circulating, nonconservative field in a body. Publication: The Astrophysical Journal Pub Date: January 1983 DOI: 10.1086/160633 Bibcode: 1983ApJ...264..620N Keywords: Binary Stars; Free Fall; Gravitation Theory; Relativity; Tides; Equations Of Motion; Pulsars; Scalars; Space-Time Functions; Astrophysics full text sources ADS | data products SIMBAD (1)