Met-Pro Corp, USA

Abstract

Adnexal masses include those affecting the ovary or fallopian tubes. We report a unique case with discrepancy between the pre-operative diagnosis (adnexal mass) and the post-operative definitive findings (appendicular tumor invading ovary). We also employ a literature review to provide four scenarios of uncertainty that are encountered between appendiceal and adnexal masses.A 58 year old female with history of treated left colon cancer, referred to the gynecology clinic with intermittent vaginal bleeding for 5 days. Examination showed lower abdominal midline mobile non-tender mass, bulky uterus and right adnexal fullness. Other history, physical examination and laboratory tests were unremarkable. US and MRI suggested a right ovarian mass and uterine fibroids. Intraoperatively, she had a right ovarian large mobile multi-locular mass. The appendix was adherent to the ovary, with mucus extruding through its tip. Appendectomy was undertaken alongside hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Histopathology showed right ovarian mucinous neoplasm, but the origin was a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (pT4aNxMx). The patient was recurrence free across 3 years of follow up.Appendicular mucocele can present as adnexal mass. Pre-operative diagnosis and differentiation is sometimes difficult.Adnexal masses need careful pre-operative diagnoses. The definitive management is based on the final intra- and post-operative findings. As a variety of scenarios could be encountered, there could be a need to involve general/colorectal surgeons in case of appendicular tumors. Patients should be counselled regarding the possible change in intra-operative plan, and are better operated upon in facilities with appropriate teams and equipment.