Abstract

This study compares the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Kernel Distance Classification (KDC) methods to classify heart disease. SVM works by transforming data into higher dimensions using the kernel and classifying data linearly using a hyperplane. Meanwhile, KDC works by finding points that represent each classification from the data that has been transformed into a higher dimension using the kernel, and the new data is predicted based on the closest distance from the point of each classification. The results show that the accuracy produced by SVM is 81.11%. The accuracy produced by the SVM model is better than that produced by the KDC model of 80.47% with a difference of 0.64%, even though both models use kernel transformation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call