Abstract
If a patent prior art search produces several hundred results, it can be annoying when the best document turns out to be the last one. Ideally the most relevant search result should be brought to the top of the list. This article discusses the particular problems which searches for multiple concepts entail, explains what ranking is and compares some ways to rank, or reorder, search results. In particular, the article deals with a special technique which examiners at the European Patent Office (EPO) can use and which has been found to work well, especially when there are several search concepts and several technical fields to be searched. This ranking technique, called Horváth–Materne ranking or pivot ranking, is based on the assumption that the best documents will not only mention the search concepts in full-text databases, but will also mention at least some of the concepts in corresponding abstract databases. The more concepts present in the abstracts, the greater the probability that the document is relevant. In principle the technique could be used to rank results in any database where both full-text and abstracts are available. The technique can be broadened by including an automatic concept extraction.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
