Abstract

Abstract Possible sources of inaccuracy in the data collecting stage and various methods to evaluate the quality of data are reviewed. Interviews of surrogates are often used in epidemiological studies, even if they are likely to introduce a higher level of inaccuracy than when subjects themselves are questioned. The preliminary results of a study on the accuracy of work history information obtained from the relatives of the subjects in a case-control study of lung cancer are presented. A mail questionnaire requested the same information from the surrogates as was asked of the original cases. Accuracy was measured for major occupational categories by evaluating sensitivity and specificity and calculating k statistic agreement. Some major occupational categories, which are well represented and traditional in the study area, showed a high specificity and sensitivity and a high k agreement. Various methods of exposure identification are reviewed. Job exposure matrices generated a priori or a posteriori were ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.