Methods for quantitative image quality evaluation of MRI parallel reconstructions: detection and perceptual difference model

Abstract

Many reconstruction algorithms are being proposed for parallel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which uses multiple coils and subsampled k-space data, and a quantitative method for comparison of algorithms is sorely needed. On such images, we compared three methods for quantitative image quality evaluation: human detection, computer detection model and a computer perceptual difference model (PDM). One-quarter sampling and three different reconstruction methods were investigated: a regularization method developed by Ying et al., a simplified regularization method and an iterative method proposed by Pruessmann et al. Images obtained from a full complement of k-space data were also included as reference images. Detection studies were performed using a simulated dark tumor added on MR images of fresh bovine liver. Human detection depended strongly on reconstruction methods used, with the two regularization methods achieving better performance than the iterative method. Images were also evaluated using detection by a channelized Hotelling observer model and by PDM scores. Both predicted the same trends as observed from human detection. We are encouraged that PDM gives trends similar to that for human detection studies. Its ease of use and applicability to a variety of MRI situations make it attractive for evaluating image quality in a variety of MR studies.