Abstract

The energy value of foods as well as energy requirements of dogs and cats is currently expressed in terms of metabolizable energy (ME). The determination of ME content of foods requires experimental animals and is too expensive and time consuming to be used routinely. Consequently, different indirect methods have been proposed in order to estimate as reliably an accurately as possible the ME content of pet food. This work analyses the main approaches proposed to date to estimate the ME content of foods for cats and dogs. The former method proposed by the NRC estimates the ME content of pet foods from proximal chemical analysis using the modified Atwater factors, assuming constant apparent digestibility coefficients for each analytical fraction. Modified Atwater factors systematically underestimate the ME content of low-fibre foods whereas they overestimate those that are high in fibre. Recently, different equations have been proposed for dogs and cats based in the estimation of apparent digestibility of energy by the crude fibre content, which improve the accuracy of prediction. In any case, whatever the method of analysis used, differences in energy digestibility related with food processing and fibre digestibility are unlikely to be accounted for. A simple in vitro enzymatic method has been recently proposed based in the close relationship that exist between energy digestibility and organic matter disappearance after two consecutive enzymatic (pepsin-pancreatin) incubation of food sample. Nutrient composition and energy value of pet foods can be also accurately and simultaneously predicted using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS).

Highlights

  • Why is it important to know the energy value of dog and cat food?All metabolic processes in animal organism involve a transfer and expediture of energy, the only source of which is food

  • Different equations have been proposed for dogs and cats based in the estimation of apparent digestibility of energy by the crude fibre content, which improve the accuracy of prediction

  • The use of constant factors for the chemically-defined entities used in factorial equations is not tenable, because constant digestibilities are assumed for each nutrient, and because the latest proposals assumes that fibre does not provide energy and they do not reflect the complex interrelationships between the chemical constituents

Read more

Summary

Methods for predicting the energy value of pet foods

ABSTRACT- The energy value of foods as well as energy requirements of dogs and cats is currently expressed in terms of metabolizable energy (ME). This work analyses the main approaches proposed to date to estimate the ME content of foods for cats and dogs The former method proposed by the NRC estimates the ME content of pet foods from proximal chemical analysis using the modified Atwater factors, assuming constant apparent digestibility coefficients for each analytical fraction. Different equations have been proposed for dogs and cats based in the estimation of apparent digestibility of energy by the crude fibre content, which improve the accuracy of prediction. Consequentemente, diferentes métodos indiretos tem sido propostos para estimar o conteúdo de EM dos alimentos PET. O método formal proposto pelo NRC estima o conteúdo de EM dos alimentos pet a partir da análise proximal usando fatores Atwater, assumindo coeficiente de digestibilidade aparente constante para cada fração analizada. A composição em nutrientes e o valor energético de alimentos pet podem ser, simultaneamente, e de forma precisa, preditos, usando espectroscopia de refletância infra vermelho (NIRS)

Expressing pet food energy density
Experimental measurement of ME content of pet foods
Use of tables
Factorial approach
Empirical equations
Test of proposed equations
In vitro approach
Conclusions
Findings
Literature Cited
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call