Abstract

International and national laws governing the management of living marine resources generally require specification of harvest limits. To assist with the management of data-limited species, stocks are often grouped into complexes and assessed and managed as a single unit. The species that comprise a complex should have similar life history, susceptibility to the fishing gear, and spatial distribution, such that common management measures will likely lead to sustainable harvest of all species in the complex. However, forming complexes to meet these standards is difficult due to the lack of basic biological or fisheries data to inform estimates of biological vulnerability and fishery susceptibility. A variety of cluster and ordination techniques are applied to bycatch rockfish species in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) as a case study to demonstrate how groupings may differ based on the multivariate techniques used and the availability and reliability of life history, fishery independent survey, and fishery catch data. For GOA rockfish, our results demonstrate that fishing gear primarily defined differences in species composition, and we suggest that these species be grouped by susceptibility to the main fishing gears while monitoring those species with high vulnerabilities to overfishing. Current GOA rockfish complex delineations (i.e., Other Rockfish and Demersal Shelf Rockfish) are consistent with the results of this study, but should be expanded across the entire GOA. Differences observed across species groupings for the variety of data types and multivariate approaches utilized demonstrate the importance of exploring a diversity of methods. As best practice in identifying species complexes, we suggest using a productivity-susceptibility analysis or expert judgment to begin groupings. Then a variety of multivariate techniques and data sources should be used to identify complexes, while balancing an appropriate number of manageable groups. Thus, optimal species complex groupings should be determined by commonality and consistency among a variety of multivariate methods and datasets.

Highlights

  • The requirement to implement catch limits for data-limited and previously unassessed stocks resulting from recent international policies, such as the Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act of 2006 (MSRA, 2007) and Common Fisheries Policy (CFP, 2013), presents scientific and management challenges for regional fishery management entities

  • We suggest the incorporation of the longline survey data in the analysis of species complexes in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA), despite some limitations in the overlap of the survey catch composition compared to the longline gear species composition

  • We provide one of the first explorations of species complex groupings based on the combination of clustering from multiple data types, multiple data aggregation scales, and a wide variety of multivariate methods (e.g., Ward’s analysis, k-mediods, correspondence analysis (CCA), and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS)), as well as, different modes (e.g., R-mode and Q-mode)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The requirement to implement catch limits for data-limited and previously unassessed stocks resulting from recent international policies, such as the Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act of 2006 (MSRA, 2007) and Common Fisheries Policy (CFP, 2013), presents scientific and management challenges for regional fishery management entities. Managing an aggregation of fish stocks or species as a single unit is one approach utilized by fisheries managers in an attempt to comply with international and federal laws (Jiao et al, 2009), reduce the number of required stock assessments (Koutsidi et al, 2016), and create manageable harvest regulations. These aggregations, known as stock or species complexes, are often determined by similarity in life history characteristics, vulnerability to the fishery, and geographic distributions (USOFR, 2009). The potential for disproportionate impacts on the species within the complex exists when complexes are formed using gear susceptibility and when selectivity or availability differs by species (DeMartini, 2019)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call