Methods for detecting outlying regions and influence diagnosis in multi-regional clinical trials

Abstract

Due to the globalization of drug development, multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) have been increasingly adopted in clinical evaluations. In MRCTs, the primary objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of new drugs in all participating regions, but heterogeneity of various relevant factors across these regions can cause inconsistency of treatment effects. In particular, outlying regions with extreme profiles can influence the overall conclusions of these studies. In this article, we propose quantitative methods to detect these outlying regions and to assess their influences in MRCTs. The approaches are as follows: (1) a method using a dfbeta-like measure, a studentized residual obtained by a leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) scheme; (2) a model-based significance testing method using a mean-shifted model; (3) a method using a relative change measure for the variance estimate of the overall effect estimator; and (4) a method using a relative change measure for the heterogeneity variance estimate in a random-effects model. Parametric bootstrap schemes are proposed to accurately assess the statistical significance and variabilities of the aforementioned influence diagnostic tools. We illustrate the effectiveness of these proposed methods via applications to two MRCTs, the RECORD and RENAAL studies.