Abstract

As research on building scalable quantum computers advances, it is important to be able to certify their correctness. Due to the exponential hardness of classically simulating quantum computation, straight-forward verification through classical simulation fails. However, we can classically simulate small scale quantum computations and hence we are able to test that devices behave as expected in this domain. This constitutes the first step towards obtaining confidence in the anticipated quantum-advantage when we extend to scales that can no longer be simulated. Realistic devices have restrictions due to their architecture and limitations due to physical imperfections and noise. Here we extend the usual ideal simulations by considering those effects. We provide a general methodology for constructing realistic simulations emulating the physical system which will both provide a benchmark for realistic devices, and guide experimental research in the quest for quantum-advantage. We exemplify our methodology by simulating a networked architecture and corresponding noise-model; in particular that of the device developed in the Networked Quantum Information Technologies Hub (NQIT) (Networked Quantum Information Technologies Hub 2018 https://nqit.ox.ac.uk/; 2016 private communication. The error model was based on communication with Chris Balance and Tom Harty, mediated through Niel de Beaudrap, early on the NQIT project. Continued collaboration and communication with experimentalists could lead in refinement of the error model, which could be subject for future work.). For our simulations we use, with suitable modification, the classical simulator of Bravyi and Gosset 2016 (Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 250501). The specific problems considered belong to the class of instantaneous quantum polynomial-time (IQP) problems (Shepherd and Bremner 2009 Proc. R. Soc. A 465 141339), a class believed to be hard for classical computing devices, and to be a promising candidate for the first demonstration of quantum-advantage. We first consider a subclass of IQP, defined in Bermejo-Vega et al 2018 (Phys. Rev. X 8 021010), involving two-dimensional dynamical quantum simulators, before moving to more general instances of IQP, but which are still restricted to the architecture of NQIT.

Highlights

  • The most significant developments in quantum technology would be that of devices for universal quantum computation, quantum simulation, or more bespoke tasks

  • As expected, including noise at the levels of the Networked Quantum Information Technologies Hub (NQIT) device leads to an outcome probability that is between the ideal and the totally random output

  • In most cases the noise that we include leads to a result within one standard deviation of the uniform distribution, or greater than one standard deviation from the perfect run

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most significant developments in quantum technology would be that of devices for universal quantum computation, quantum simulation, or more bespoke tasks These are likely to be disruptive innovations as they can, theoretically, provide an exponential speed-up in solving certain problems, as well as smaller advantages in other areas [6]. Before a first important milestone is to provide examples and proof-of-principle demonstrations of some advantage being achieved with existing technologies [7]. This area of research has been termed the quantumadvantage problem† [10, 11]. One may say that it has demonstrated quantum-advantage by disproving the following hypothesis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call