METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PROSECUTOR OF UKRAINE

Abstract

The article deals with the concept of methodology and types of methods of studying the constitutional and legal status of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine. The works of such authors are analyzed: VS Babkova V.O. Bonyak, IV Vernidubova, L.P. Zhuk, A.E. Konversky, O.V. Krushelnytska, A.Yu. Oliynyk, O.F.Skakun, F.O. Chmilenko The philosophical, general theoretical, constitutional aspects of methodology and separate groups of methods are investigated. The specific types of methods of research of the constitutional and legal status of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine are analyzed. In the framework of scientific research an analysis of the use of the following methods is carried out: 1) dialectic method; 2) system method; 3) historical method; 4) formal-logical methods of research. The application of these methods will provide a qualitative analysis of the study of the constitutional and legal status of the prosecutor’s office in Ukraine in the process of reforming it and will allow formulating qualitative conclusions, proposals and recommendations. The author’s definition of the methodology and methods of study of the constitutional and legal status of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine is proposed. The methodology of the study of the constitutional and legal status of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine in the context of its reform is the doctrine of scientific methods of knowing the constitutional and legal status of the prosecutor’s office of Ukraine, which includes a system of general approaches, principles, methods, methods and means of such knowledge, conditions and preconditions for cognitive activity, including philosophical-ideological and methodological analysis for the purpose of scientific research of the most informed choice. The signs of the methodology of the study of the constitutional and legal status of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine in the conditions of its reform are: 1) the doctrine of scientific methods of knowledge of the constitutional and legal status of the Prosecutor’sOffice of Ukraine; 2) a system of general approaches, principles, methods, methods and means of knowing the constitutional and legalstatus of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine; 3) the combination of knowledge and activities, as conditions and prerequisites for thecognitive activity of prosecutors, including philosophical and ideological and methodological analysis, transforming their activitiesinto means of conscious choice and scientific research. Conclusions and recommendations are given.