Abstract

This paper develops and implements a decision support framework that prescribes and prioritizes cost-effective safety improvements at deserving locations under funding constraints, economic and comprehensive crash cost methods, at rural two-lane highway sections. The framework is demonstrated using Indiana’s 7700-mile rural two-lane network. For sections that are both deficient and hazardous under unconstrained budget and economic crash cost method, it was determined that $55M is needed. Assuming a safety budget of $1M/year over a 5-year period, it was found that 170–180 crashes (translating to $8–15M) could be prevented. If the annual budget is increased to $2M/year over a 5-year period, 244 crashes (translating to $12–26M) can be prevented. Monetary amounts are in Year 2000 constant dollars. Overall, the results suggest that perpetual increases in highway safety improvements spending are not likely to be accompanied by a commensurate reduction of crashes at rural two-lane highways. In other words, there is a ceiling to the effectiveness of engineering safety countermeasures, and therefore non-engineering countermeasures such as safety education and enforcement must be sought to complement the engineering efforts at rural two-lane highways.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.