Abstract

Abstract The relation between occupational silica exposure and lung cancer has been addressed in numerous epidemiologic studies, especially during the past decade. Despite the considerable attention given to this topic, no scientific consensus has been reached regarding the potential carcinogenicity of silica in humans. The principal reasons for uncertainty are inadequacies of exposure assessment and incomplete control of confounding from other workplace agents and from cigarette smoking. This article is a review of the biases that have hindered the interpretation of epidemiologic research on silica and lung cancer. Exposure assessment is discussed in terms of the completeness and validity of exposure quantification for silica and other potentially relevant workplace exposures. The advantages and limitations of inferring exposure levels from radiographic evidence of pulmonary fibrosis are also considered. Confounding bias, from cigarette smoking and workplace exposures other than silica (e.g., radon), is ...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.