Abstract

Qualitative and quantitative analyses of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated on the surfaces of nanomaterials are important for understanding their toxicity and toxic mechanisms, which are in turn beneficial for manufacturing more biocompatible nanomaterials in many industrial fields. Electron spin resonance (ESR) is a useful tool for detecting ROS formation. However, using this technique without first considering the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials and proper conditions of the spin trapping agent (such as incubation time) may lead to misinterpretation of the resulting data. In this report, we suggest methodological considerations for ESR as pertains to magnetism, sample preparation and proper incubation time with spin trapping agents. Based on our results, each spin trapping agent should be given the proper incubation time. For nanomaterials having magnetic properties, it is useful to remove these nanomaterials via centrifugation after reacting with spin trapping agents. Sonication for the purpose of sample dispersion and sample light exposure should be controlled during ESR in order to enhance the obtained ROS signal. This report will allow researchers to better design ESR spin trapping applications involving nanomaterials.

Highlights

  • dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO), (b) Stability review of the BMPO-OOH adduct by the hypoxanthine–xanthine oxidase system in the presence of BMPO, (c) Stability review of the TPC-1O2 adduct generated by the Rose Bengal photosensitizer in the presence of TPC

  • We suggest methodological considerations to follow in regards to the magnetism of nanomaterials, incubation time of spin trapping agents, and various other factors that can lead to distortion of Electron spin resonance (ESR) signals of nanomaterials such as light exposure and sonication, which are often used carelessly in ESR for measuring the ROS generated from metal oxide nanomaterials

  • We analyzed the stability of the spin adduct as a function of the incubation time in a positive control system (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

DMPO, (b) Stability review of the BMPO-OOH adduct by the hypoxanthine–xanthine oxidase system in the presence of BMPO, (c) Stability review of the TPC-1O2 adduct generated by the Rose Bengal photosensitizer in the presence of TPC. ESR with spin trapping agents is a very robust and valuable method of detecting ROS, selection of the correct specific type of spin trapping agent, sample preparation method, and incubation time between spin trapping agents and target materials must be addressed in greater detail. He et al, for example, contended that light exposure may affect the formation of ROS in metal nanoparticles, and that it influences the formation of free radicals[10,14]. We suggest methodological considerations to follow in regards to the magnetism of nanomaterials, incubation time of spin trapping agents, and various other factors that can lead to distortion of ESR signals of nanomaterials such as light exposure and sonication, which are often used carelessly in ESR for measuring the ROS generated from metal oxide nanomaterials

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call