Methodological Considerations for Studies Evaluating Bleeding Prediction Using Hemostatic Point-of-Care Tests in Cardiac Surgery

Abstract

A certain proportion of patients undergoing cardiac surgery may experience bleeding complications that worsen outcomes. Numerous studies have investigated bleeding in cardiac surgery and some evaluate the role of hemostatic point-of-care tests in cardiac surgery patients. The prevalence of excessive bleeding varies in the literature, and such variability stems from the lack of a standardized definition of excessive bleeding. Herein, we report numerous definitions of excessive bleeding and methodological considerations for studies evaluating bleeding using hemostatic point-of-care tests in cardiac surgery patients. We evaluated the role of hemostatic point-of-care devices in contemporary research on bleeding complications and hemostatic management in cardiac surgery. The type of studies (prospective vs. retrospective, interventional vs. observational), patient selection (less complex vs. complex cases), as well as data analysis with comprehensive statistical considerations have also been provided. This article provides a comprehensive insight into the research field of bleeding complications in cardiac surgery and may help readers to better understand methodological flaws and how they influence current evidence.