Abstract

The article is devoted to the theoretical foundations and analysis of the experience of subjects of the Russian Federation in the field of regional development risk management. The article examines the concept of risk, its difference and relationship with the
 concepts of uncertainty, threat, danger, security and others. It is determined that dangers are
 constantly present in the regional economy. And risk, as a measurable uncertainty with multiple outcomes, for which the probability of occurrence of a risk event is calculated, is manifested as a result of the occurrence of a hazard. When comparing the concepts of risk and
 security, this means that the security of the regional economy is manifested in the ability to
 resist threats and manage risks, and not in the complete absence of dangers. It is revealed
 that ISO standards distinguish between the concepts of risk management and risk management. For further discussion, risk management is understood as a systematic approach to
 using the full range of mechanisms available to public authorities to reduce emerging risks
 and threats to the socio-economic development of the region. Further, the analysis of risk
 management in the practice of regional management on the example of the Omsk, Novosibirsk and Tyumen regions is carried out. The relevant tools in the activities of government
 bodies, such as territorial development strategies, state programs and projects, were identified, which allowed us to introduce a classification of risks with the allocation of strategic,
 tactical risks of territorial development and project management risks, among which there is
 a strategic level. The analysis of the implemented tools for compliance with the mandatory
 stages of risk management showed mainly the absence of risk identification, unified requirements for risk accounting and systematic risk management of regional development. Among
 the assessed regions, the Tyumen region has the best practices in terms of risk management. For a more detailed analysis authors highlighted the key institutional and instrumental
 elements of risk management such as risk committee, strategic risk map, risk register, action
 plan for risk management, and defined logical relationships between them.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.