Abstract

Ecosystem service valuations focusing on the assessment of ecosystem service values in space and time have recently been receiving considerable attention. Ecosystem service valuation data are critical for developing national ecosystem accounts and for assessment of costs and benefits associated with national strategies and plans. In this article, we discuss selected methodological aspects of ecosystem service valuation at the national level for the Czech Republic. We present a classification of ecosystems based on CORINE Land Cover and Consolidated Layer of Ecosystems of the Czech Republic. The focal point of our article is a systematic review of ecosystem service values. A systematic review requires a standardised protocol for incorporation of valuation studies. To illustrate the proposed methodology, we conducted a search of ecosystem service valuation studies at the European level. While there is a significant number of ecosystem service valuation studies, the number of studies which could be used for an effective value transfer is limited. We discuss the limitations of the value transfer approach and suggest further steps for improving the scientific basis for national level valuations.

Highlights

  • Mapping and assessment of ecosystem services should contribute to the communication of value provided by nature to society (Costanza et al 2014)

  • We focus on improving the procedures for value transfer information to be applied in national level value transfer

  • The possible reasons for this are outlined in our paper – limitations of current value transfer techniques or incomplete information in studies serving as inputs for systematic review (SR) valuation studies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mapping and assessment of ecosystem services should contribute to the communication of value provided by nature to society (Costanza et al 2014). Regional and national applications of the mapping and assessment of the economic value of ecosystem services has received close attention (Costanza et al 2014, Kubiszewski et al 2013, Schägner et al 2013, Niquisse and Cabral 2017, Anderson et al 2017) As these assessments rely on existing information about ecosystem service values, the value (benefit) transfer approach has been applied.

Methodological approach to valuation at the national level
Classification of ecosystems
Classification of ecosystem services
Valuation by value transfer
Systematic review of ecosystem service values
Structure of systematic review
Objectives of valuation
Results of systematic review of valuation studies
Transferability of results and limitations
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call