Abstract
Abstract This article presents the first nationwide German survey on methods of spatial planning in practice in public planning institutions as well as in private planning offices. The main findings are: Firstly, general deficits in methodological competences of the professionals. Secondly, differences between the methods regarding familiarity, appliance and input-output- relations. Methods for the formation of communication processes between different parties in the planning process have considerably gained importance. In contrast, the traditional rational and elaborated valuation methods are less known and are more critically assessed by the respondents. However, a general “communicative turn” in planning methods cannot be observed. These findings are expected to have consequences for the further conception of study programs in spatial planning and to stimulate further research. One important perspective is that a systematic and innovative combination of both types of planning methods leads to a more ra...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.