Abstract

Fatigue testing in kingpins consists in applying cyclic forces to simulate the mechanical loads experienced by this automotive component in practice. In this context, Laboratório de Metalurgia Física (LAMEF) has a quality system implemented as suggested by ISO/IEC 17025 standard, and for the test to be under the management structure, the method must be validated. Method validation is a documented evidence that represents the standardization and indicates its suitability for a certain purpose. Therefore, this work presents the method validation for fatigue tests in kingpins. Thus, selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, range, precision, accuracy, stability and robustness were used as validation criteria. The interpretation of each criterion showed a suitable performance and guaranteed the method validation according the methodology proposed.

Highlights

  • Product certification has been used to the Market and is an essential requirement of consumers aiming at quality and cost

  • In Brazil, Laboratório de Metalurgia Física (LAMEF) is accredited to INMETRO, according to the NBR ISO/IEC 17025 [1], to perform fatigue tests in kingpins

  • This mechanical test is based on NBR NM-ISO 8716 [2] and consists in the application of cyclic forces that simulate the loads experienced by the kingpin

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Product certification has been used to the Market and is an essential requirement of consumers aiming at quality and cost. On February, 2008, the National Institute of Metrology, Standardization and Industrial Quality (INMETRO) Ordinance No 70/2008 was formalized, establishing compulsory certification for kingpins, used on the vehicles carrying dangerous goods and cargoes, and must be carried out by a Product Certification Body (OCP), duly accredited by INMETRO. The main acceptance criteria often considered in a method validation are selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, range of work, precision, accuracy, stability, and robustness [3]. Roiffé et al [4] analysed repeatability, intermediate accuracy, matrix interference, limit of quantification, linearity, carryover and robustness to validate new analytical method for the analysis of catecholamines and its biotransformation products. To [3,13,15,16,17,18], the criteria used were: selectivity, linearity, precision, accuracy, stability, and robustness and all the forces were acquired in laboratory tests

Equipment
Tested kingpin
Mechanical testing
Evaluated criteria
Selectivity
Linearity
Sensitivity
Working range
Precision
Accuracy
Robustness The robustness was analysed by two factors: factor
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.